GeForce GTX 675MX vs GRID K280Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 675MX vs GRID K280Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 675MX vs GRID K280Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 675MX

2012

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 100W instead of 225W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).

GRID K280Q

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌125% higher power demand at 225W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 675MX is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.9% in PassMark G3D (2,951 vs 2,840), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 675MX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID K280Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID K280Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 675MX has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 675MX vs GRID K280Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 675MX

The GeForce GTX 675MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,951 points.

GRID K280Q

The GRID K280Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,840 points. Launch price was $1,875.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 675MX scores 2,951 and the GRID K280Q reaches 2,840 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 675MX is built on Kepler while the GRID K280Q uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 960 (GeForce GTX 675MX) vs 1,536 (GRID K280Q). Raw compute: 1.256 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 675MX) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K280Q).

Feature	GeForce GTX 675MX	GRID K280Q
G3D Mark Score	2,951+4%	2,840
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	960	1536+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.256 TFLOPS	2.289 TFLOPS+82%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	128+60%
L1 Cache	80 KB	128 KB+60%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 675MX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID K280Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 675MX	GRID K280Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 675MX has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K280Q carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 675MX gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 675MX and 64-bit on the GRID K280Q.

Feature	GeForce GTX 675MX	GRID K280Q
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 675MX) vs 11_0 (GRID K280Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce GTX 675MX	GRID K280Q
DirectX	12 (11_0)+9%	11_0
Max Displays	4	0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 675MX draws 100W versus the GRID K280Q's 225W — a 76.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 675MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 675MX) vs 350W (GRID K280Q). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 675MX	GRID K280Q
TDP	100W-56%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	—	1mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	29.5+134%	12.6

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GRID K280Q (2013 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GTX 675MX	GRID K280Q
MSRP	—	$2000
Codename	GK104	GK104
Release	October 1 2012	June 28 2013
Ranking	#588	#595

Search GeForce GTX 675MX on Amazon

Search GRID K280Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.