GeForce GTX 675MX vs Quadro K1200

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 675MX vs Quadro K1200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 675MX vs Quadro K1200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 675MX

2012

Why buy it

✅32.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
❌122.2% higher power demand at 100W vs 45W.

Quadro K1200

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 45W instead of 100W, a 55W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 675MX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 675MX is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 32.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro K1200 instead at 2,965 vs 2,951, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 675MX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro K1200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro K1200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 675MX has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 675MX vs Quadro K1200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 675MX

The GeForce GTX 675MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,951 points.

Quadro K1200

The Quadro K1200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 28 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,965 points. Launch price was $321.97.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 675MX scores 2,951 and the Quadro K1200 reaches 2,965 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 675MX is built on Kepler while the Quadro K1200 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 960 (GeForce GTX 675MX) vs 512 (Quadro K1200). Raw compute: 1.256 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 675MX) vs 1.0578 TFLOPS (Quadro K1200).

Feature	GeForce GTX 675MX	Quadro K1200
G3D Mark Score	2,951	2,965
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	960+88%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.256 TFLOPS+19%	1.0578 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+150%	32
L1 Cache	80 KB	256 KB+220%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 675MX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K1200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 675MX	Quadro K1200
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 675MX and 64-bit on the Quadro K1200. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 675MX) vs 2 MB (Quadro K1200) — the Quadro K1200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 675MX	Quadro K1200
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 675MX draws 100W versus the Quadro K1200's 45W — a 75.9% difference. The Quadro K1200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 675MX) vs 350W (Quadro K1200). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 675MX	Quadro K1200
TDP	100W	45W-55%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	29.5	65.9+123%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro K1200 (2015 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GTX 675MX	Quadro K1200
MSRP	—	$300
Codename	GK104	GM107
Release	October 1 2012	January 28 2015
Ranking	#588	#586

Search GeForce GTX 675MX on Amazon

Search Quadro K1200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.