GeForce GTX 675MX vs Tesla C2075
GeForce GTX 675MX
Popular choices:
Tesla C2075
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 675MX is positioned at rank #75 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 675MX
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla C2075 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 675MX offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 675MX | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Tesla C2075 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 675MX and Tesla C2075
GeForce GTX 675MX
The GeForce GTX 675MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,951 points.
Tesla C2075
The Tesla C2075 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 247W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,017 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 675MX scores 2,951 and the Tesla C2075 reaches 3,017 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 675MX is built on Kepler while the Tesla C2075 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 960 (GeForce GTX 675MX) vs 448 (Tesla C2075). Raw compute: 1.256 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 675MX) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2075).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 675MX | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,951 | 3,017+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 960+114% | 448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.256 TFLOPS+22% | 1.028 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 80+43% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 896 KB+1020% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 675MX | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 675MX comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2075 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 675MX offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GTX 675MX) vs 768 KB (Tesla C2075) — the Tesla C2075 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 675MX | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 675MX) vs 12 (11_0) (Tesla C2075). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 675MX | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 675MX) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Tesla C2075).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 675MX | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | — |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | — |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 675MX draws 100W versus the Tesla C2075's 247W — a 84.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 675MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 675MX) vs 350W (Tesla C2075). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 675MX | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-60% | 247W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 29.5+142% | 12.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 675MX is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 675MX | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $500 |
| Codename | GK104 | GF110 |
| Release | October 1 2012 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #588 | #553 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 675MX and Tesla C2075
