GeForce GTX 675MX vs Tesla C2075 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 675MX vs Tesla C2075 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce GTX 675MX vs Tesla C2075: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 675MX
2012Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 247W, a 147W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Tesla C2075
2011Why buy it
- ✅GeForce GTX 675MX is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Tesla C2075 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌147% higher power demand at 247W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 675MX vs Tesla C2075 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 675MX
The GeForce GTX 675MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,951 points.
Tesla C2075
The Tesla C2075 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 247W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,017 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 675MX scores 2,951 and the Tesla C2075 reaches 3,017 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 675MX is built on Kepler while the Tesla C2075 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 960 (GeForce GTX 675MX) vs 448 (Tesla C2075). Raw compute: 1.256 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 675MX) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2075).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 675MX | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,951 | 3,017+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 960+114% | 448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.256 TFLOPS+22% | 1.028 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 80+43% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 896 KB+1020% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 675MX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tesla C2075 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 675MX | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 675MX has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2075 carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 675MX gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 675MX and 64-bit on the Tesla C2075. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GTX 675MX) vs 768 KB (Tesla C2075) — the Tesla C2075 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 675MX | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 675MX) vs 12 (11_0) (Tesla C2075). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 675MX | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 675MX) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Tesla C2075).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 675MX | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | — |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | — |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 675MX draws 100W versus the Tesla C2075's 247W — a 84.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 675MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 675MX) vs 350W (Tesla C2075). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 675MX | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-60% | 247W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 29.5+142% | 12.2 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce GTX 675MX (2012 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 675MX | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Codename | GK104 | GF110 |
| Release | October 1 2012 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #588 | #553 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 675MX and Tesla C2075
