GRID K280Q vs Quadro M1000M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K280Q vs Quadro M1000M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID K280Q vs Quadro M1000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K280Q

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌462.5% higher power demand at 225W vs 40W.

Quadro M1000M

2015

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 40W instead of 225W, a 185W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro M1000M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (2,845 vs 2,840), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID K280Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID K280Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro M1000M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GRID K280Q vs Quadro M1000M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID K280Q

The GRID K280Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,840 points. Launch price was $1,875.

Quadro M1000M

The Quadro M1000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 993 MHz to 1072 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,845 points. Launch price was $200.89.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID K280Q scores 2,840 and the Quadro M1000M reaches 2,845 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K280Q is built on Kepler while the Quadro M1000M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K280Q) vs 512 (Quadro M1000M). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K280Q) vs 1.017 TFLOPS (Quadro M1000M).

Feature	GRID K280Q	Quadro M1000M
G3D Mark Score	2,840	2,845
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1536+200%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.289 TFLOPS+125%	1.017 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	128+300%	32
L1 Cache	128 KB	256 KB+100%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID K280Q	Quadro M1000M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID K280Q has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M1000M carries 4 GB. Quadro M1000M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K280Q and 64-bit on the Quadro M1000M. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID K280Q) vs 2 MB (Quadro M1000M) — the Quadro M1000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID K280Q	Quadro M1000M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K280Q draws 225W versus the Quadro M1000M's 40W — a 139.6% difference. The Quadro M1000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K280Q) vs 350W (Quadro M1000M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID K280Q	Quadro M1000M
TDP	225W	40W-82%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	—
Perf/Watt	12.6	71.1+464%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro M1000M (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	GRID K280Q	Quadro M1000M
MSRP	$2000	—
Codename	GK104	GM107
Release	June 28 2013	August 18 2015
Ranking	#595	#594

Search GRID K280Q on Amazon

Search Quadro M1000M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.