GRID K280Q vs Radeon R7 260

GRID K280Q

2013Core: 745 MHz

Radeon R7 260

2013Boost: 1100 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GRID K280Q

225

2,840

0.0%

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Radeon R7 260

2,892

+1.8%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID K280Q is positioned at rank #323 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GRID K280Q

#308

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

10404%

#323

GRID K280Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50

100%

#324

FirePro M2000

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

100%

#325

Tesla K20c

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $500

98%

#326

GRID M6-1Q

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100

97%

#327

Quadro FX 380

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

96%

#328

Tesla C2050 / C2070

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $30

96%

#329

FirePro M7740

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

94%

#330

Quadro FX 570

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

92%

#331

RTXA5000-24Q

MSRP: $3721|Avg: $2100

91%

#332

GRID P40-1Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

90%

#334

Tesla M10

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500

89%

#335

Tesla C2050

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $95

89%

#336

FirePro S10000

MSRP: $3599|Avg: $500

89%

#337

Quadro FX 3450

MSRP: $119|Avg: $30

88%

#338

GRID P40-24Q

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $200

87%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R7 260 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GRID K280Q offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GRID K280Q	Radeon R7 260
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GRID K280Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GRID K280Q holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $110), it costs 55% less, resulting in a 116% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GRID K280Q	Radeon R7 260
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+116%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($50)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($110)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GRID K280Q Benchmark Check

Radeon R7 260 Benchmark Check

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GRID K280Q and Radeon R7 260

GRID K280Q

The GRID K280Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,840 points. Launch price was $1,875.

Radeon R7 260

The Radeon R7 260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 17 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1100 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,892 points. Launch price was $109.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID K280Q scores 2,840 and the Radeon R7 260 reaches 2,892 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K280Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 260 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K280Q) vs 768 (Radeon R7 260). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K280Q) vs 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 260).

Feature	GRID K280Q	Radeon R7 260
G3D Mark Score	2,840	2,892+2%
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1536+100%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.289 TFLOPS+49%	1.536 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	128+167%	48
L1 Cache	128 KB	192 KB+50%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID K280Q	Radeon R7 260
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID K280Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 260 has 1 GB. The GRID K280Q offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GRID K280Q) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 260) — the GRID K280Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID K280Q	Radeon R7 260
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+100%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_0 (GRID K280Q) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R7 260). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.

Feature	GRID K280Q	Radeon R7 260
DirectX	11_0	12 (12_0)+9%
Max Displays	0	3

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K280Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R7 260's 95W — a 81.3% difference. The Radeon R7 260 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K280Q) vs 400W (Radeon R7 260). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 170mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GRID K280Q	Radeon R7 260
TDP	225W	95W-58%
Recommended PSU	350W-13%	400W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	1mm	170mm
Height	—	112mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	—	80
Perf/Watt	12.6	30.4+141%

💰

Value Analysis

The GRID K280Q launched at $2000 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon R7 260 launched at $109 and now averages $110. The GRID K280Q costs 54.5% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 56.8 (GRID K280Q) vs 26.3 (Radeon R7 260) — the GRID K280Q offers 116% better value.