Quadro K5000M vs Quadro M1000M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K5000M vs Quadro M1000M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K5000M vs Quadro M1000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K5000M

2012

Why buy it

✅42.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌150% higher power demand at 100W vs 40W.

Quadro M1000M

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 40W instead of 100W, a 60W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K5000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K5000M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 42.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro M1000M instead at 2,845 vs 2,805, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K5000M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro M1000M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro M1000M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K5000M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K5000M vs Quadro M1000M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K5000M

The Quadro K5000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 7 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 601 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,805 points. Launch price was $329.99.

Quadro M1000M

The Quadro M1000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 993 MHz to 1072 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,845 points. Launch price was $200.89.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K5000M scores 2,805 and the Quadro M1000M reaches 2,845 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K5000M is built on Kepler while the Quadro M1000M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (Quadro K5000M) vs 512 (Quadro M1000M). Raw compute: 1.615 TFLOPS (Quadro K5000M) vs 1.017 TFLOPS (Quadro M1000M).

Feature	Quadro K5000M	Quadro M1000M
G3D Mark Score	2,805	2,845+1%
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1344+163%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.615 TFLOPS+59%	1.017 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	112+250%	32
L1 Cache	112 KB	256 KB+129%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K5000M	Quadro M1000M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K5000M and 64-bit on the Quadro M1000M. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro K5000M) vs 2 MB (Quadro M1000M) — the Quadro M1000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K5000M	Quadro M1000M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K5000M draws 100W versus the Quadro M1000M's 40W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro M1000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K5000M) vs 350W (Quadro M1000M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.