Quadro K5000M vs Quadro M620

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K5000M vs Quadro M620 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K5000M vs Quadro M620: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K5000M

2012

Why buy it

✅47.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌233.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 30W.

Quadro M620

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 30W instead of 100W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K5000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K5000M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 47.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (2,805 vs 2,758), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K5000M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro K5000M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro K5000M vs Quadro M620 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K5000M

The Quadro K5000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 7 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 601 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,805 points. Launch price was $329.99.

Quadro M620

The Quadro M620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 756 MHz to 977 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,758 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K5000M scores 2,805 and the Quadro M620 reaches 2,758 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K5000M is built on Kepler while the Quadro M620 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (Quadro K5000M) vs 512 (Quadro M620). Raw compute: 1.615 TFLOPS (Quadro K5000M) vs 1 TFLOPS (Quadro M620).

Feature	Quadro K5000M	Quadro M620
G3D Mark Score	2,805+2%	2,758
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1344+163%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.615 TFLOPS+62%	1 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	112+250%	32
L1 Cache	112 KB	256 KB+129%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K5000M	Quadro M620
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K5000M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M620 carries 2 GB. Quadro K5000M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K5000M and 64-bit on the Quadro M620. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro K5000M) vs 2 MB (Quadro M620) — the Quadro M620 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K5000M	Quadro M620
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro K5000M) vs 12_1 (Quadro M620). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	Quadro K5000M	Quadro M620
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12_1
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) (Quadro K5000M) vs NVENC 5th Gen (Quadro M620). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs NVDEC 2nd Gen.

Feature	Quadro K5000M	Quadro M620
Encoder	1st Gen NVENC (Kepler)	NVENC 5th Gen
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP5	NVDEC 2nd Gen
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K5000M draws 100W versus the Quadro M620's 30W — a 107.7% difference. The Quadro M620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K5000M) vs 350W (Quadro M620). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro K5000M	Quadro M620
TDP	100W	30W-70%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	1mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	81°C	—
Perf/Watt	28.1	91.9+227%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro M620 (2017 vs 2012).

Feature	Quadro K5000M	Quadro M620
MSRP	—	$0
Codename	GK104	GM107
Release	August 7 2012	January 11 2017
Ranking	#600	#606

Search Quadro K5000M on Amazon

Search Quadro M620 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.