Quadro K5000M vs Radeon HD 8950

NVIDIA

Quadro K5000M

2012Core: 601 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 8950

2012Boost: 1250 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro K5000M vs Radeon HD 8950 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K5000M vs Radeon HD 8950 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K5000M vs Radeon HD 8950: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K5000M

2012

Why buy it

  • 33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
  • Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8950 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Radeon HD 8950

2012

Why buy it

  • 20.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2012 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 8950 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 20.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (2,828 vs 2,805), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro K5000M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 3 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 8950 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 8950 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K5000M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K5000M vs Radeon HD 8950 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro K5000M

The Quadro K5000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 7 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 601 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,805 points. Launch price was $329.99.

AMD

Radeon HD 8950

The Radeon HD 8950 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,828 points. Launch price was $449.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K5000M scores 2,805 and the Radeon HD 8950 reaches 2,828 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K5000M is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 8950 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (Quadro K5000M) vs 1,792 (Radeon HD 8950). Raw compute: 1.615 TFLOPS (Quadro K5000M) vs 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8950).

FeatureQuadro K5000MRadeon HD 8950
G3D Mark Score
2,805
2,828
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1344
1792+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.615 TFLOPS
2.867 TFLOPS+78%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
112
112
L1 Cache
112 KB
448 KB+300%
L2 Cache
512 KB
768 KB+50%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro K5000MRadeon HD 8950
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K5000M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8950 carries 3 GB. Quadro K5000M gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K5000M and 256-bit on the Radeon HD 8950. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro K5000M) vs 768 KB (Radeon HD 8950) — the Radeon HD 8950 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro K5000MRadeon HD 8950
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+33%
3 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
256-bit+300%
L2 Cache
512 KB
768 KB+50%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro K5000M) vs 12_0 (Radeon HD 8950). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro K5000MRadeon HD 8950
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12_0
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) (Quadro K5000M) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 8950). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 3.1.

FeatureQuadro K5000MRadeon HD 8950
Encoder
1st Gen NVENC (Kepler)
VCE 1.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
UVD 3.1
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K5000M draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 8950's 200W — a 66.7% difference. The Quadro K5000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K5000M) vs 500W (Radeon HD 8950). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin.

FeatureQuadro K5000MRadeon HD 8950
TDP
100W-50%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
6-pin + 8-pin
Length
267mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
81°C
Perf/Watt
28.1+99%
14.1