Radeon Pro 450 vs Radeon R9 M380

AMD

Radeon Pro 450

2016Core: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M380

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon Pro 450 vs Radeon R9 M380 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro 450 vs Radeon R9 M380 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro 450 vs Radeon R9 M380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro 450

2016

Why buy it

  • 27.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Draws 35W instead of 75W, a 40W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Radeon R9 M380

2015

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 450 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 114.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro 450 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 27.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R9 M380 instead at 2,752 vs 2,723, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Pro 450 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 M380 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M380 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro 450 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon Pro 450 vs Radeon R9 M380 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon Pro 450

The Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,723 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M380

The Radeon R9 M380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,752 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 450 scores 2,723 and the Radeon R9 M380 reaches 2,752 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 450 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R9 M380 uses GCN 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon Pro 450) vs 768 (Radeon R9 M380). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 450) vs 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M380).

FeatureRadeon Pro 450Radeon R9 M380
G3D Mark Score
2,723
2,752+1%
Architecture
GCN 4.0
GCN 2.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640
768+20%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.024 TFLOPS
1.536 TFLOPS+50%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40
48+20%
L1 Cache
160 KB
192 KB+20%
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro 450Radeon R9 M380
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro 450 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M380 carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M380 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 450 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M380. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 450) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M380) — the Radeon Pro 450 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro 450Radeon R9 M380
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon Pro 450) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 M380). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.

FeatureRadeon Pro 450Radeon R9 M380
DirectX
12_0
12 (12_0)
Max Displays
0
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 450) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M380). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 6.0.

FeatureRadeon Pro 450Radeon R9 M380
Encoder
VCE 3.4
VCE 3.0
Decoder
UVD 6.3
UVD 6.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265 (HEVC),MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 450 draws 35W versus the Radeon R9 M380's 75W — a 72.7% difference. The Radeon Pro 450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 450) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M380). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureRadeon Pro 450Radeon R9 M380
TDP
35W-53%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
1mm
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
77.8+112%
36.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro 450 came in at $0, while the Radeon R9 M380 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon Pro 450 was 100+% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Radeon Pro 450) vs 9.2 (Radeon R9 M380) — the Radeon Pro 450 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 450 (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon Pro 450Radeon R9 M380
MSRP
$0-100%
$300
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
9.2
Codename
Baffin
Strato
Release
October 30 2016
May 5 2015
Ranking
#612
#607

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.