GeForce GTX 770M
VS
Radeon Pro 450

GeForce GTX 770M vs Radeon Pro 450

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 770M

2013Core: 811 MHzBoost: 797 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro 450

2016Core: 800 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 770M is positioned at rank #54 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 770M

#19
Radeon RX 5600
MSRP: $229|Avg: $150
92%
#44
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
195%
#46
177%
#47
176%
#51
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
160%
#52
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
159%
#54
GeForce GTX 770M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
100%
#58
GeForce 770M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
97%
#62
Radeon 820M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25
96%
#65
94%
#66
94%
#68
GeForce GTX 850M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 770M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (3 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 450.

InsightGeForce GTX 770MRadeon Pro 450
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2.2%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+50%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 770M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 770M holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $40), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 2.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX 770MRadeon Pro 450
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+2.2%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 770M and Radeon Pro 450

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 770M

The GeForce GTX 770M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 811 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,784 points. Launch price was $189.99.

AMD

Radeon Pro 450

The Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,723 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 770M scores 2,784 and the Radeon Pro 450 reaches 2,723 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 770M is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro 450 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 960 (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 640 (Radeon Pro 450). Raw compute: 1.53 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 450).

FeatureGeForce GTX 770MRadeon Pro 450
G3D Mark Score
2,784+2%
2,723
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
960+50%
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.53 TFLOPS+49%
1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs
24+50%
16
TMUs
80+100%
40
L1 Cache
80 KB
160 KB+100%
L2 Cache
0.38 MB
1 MB+163%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 770MRadeon Pro 450
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 770M comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 450 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 770M offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 450) — the Radeon Pro 450 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 770MRadeon Pro 450
VRAM Capacity
3 GB+50%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.38 MB
1 MB+163%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 12_0 (Radeon Pro 450). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GTX 770MRadeon Pro 450
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12_0
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GTX 770M) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 450). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 6.3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 770MRadeon Pro 450
Encoder
1st Gen NVENC (Kepler)
VCE 3.4
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 770M draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro 450's 35W — a 72.7% difference. The Radeon Pro 450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 450). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 770MRadeon Pro 450
TDP
75W
35W-53%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
37.1
77.8+110%
💰

Value Analysis

Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 69.6 (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 68.1 (Radeon Pro 450) — the GeForce GTX 770M offers 2.2% better value. The Radeon Pro 450 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 770MRadeon Pro 450
MSRP
$0
Avg Price (30d)
$40
$40
Performance per Dollar
69.6+2%
68.1
Codename
GK106
Baffin
Release
May 30 2013
October 30 2016
Ranking
#603
#612