
Radeon HD 8770
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 4150
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8770 is positioned at rank 271 and the Radeon Pro WX 4150 is on rank 155, so the Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8770
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 4150
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8770.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8770 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon Pro WX 4150 holds the technical lead. Priced at $120 (vs $150), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 26.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8770 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+26.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8770 and Radeon Pro WX 4150

Radeon HD 8770
The Radeon HD 8770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 775 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,607 points.

Radeon Pro WX 4150
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,642 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8770 scores 2,607 and the Radeon Pro WX 4150 reaches 2,642 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8770 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon HD 8770) vs 896 (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Raw compute: 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8770) vs 1.887 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Boost clocks: 825 MHz vs 1053 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8770 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,607 | 2,642+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 896+133% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6336 TFLOPS | 1.887 TFLOPS+198% |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | 1053 MHz+28% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 56+133% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 224 KB+133% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8770 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 8770 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 8770) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4150) — the Radeon Pro WX 4150 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8770 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon HD 8770) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8770 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12 (12_0) |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon HD 8770) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8770 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | VCE 3.4 (Polaris) |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8770 draws 50W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4150's 50W — a 0% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8770) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8770 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 52.1 | 52.8+1% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8770 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 launched at $300 and now averages $120. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 costs 20% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.4 (Radeon HD 8770) vs 22.0 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) — the Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers 26.4% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8770 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-50% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $120-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.4 | 22.0+26% |
| Codename | Mars | Baffin |
| Release | April 1 2013 | March 1 2017 |
| Ranking | #844 | #620 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















