Quadro 6000 vs Radeon HD 8770

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 6000 vs Radeon HD 8770 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 6000 vs Radeon HD 8770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 6000

2010

Why buy it

✅237.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
2832.7% HIGHER MSRP
$4,399 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 17.4 G3D/$ ($4,399 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌308% higher power demand at 204W vs 50W.

Radeon HD 8770

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,249 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2740.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.4 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 204W, a 154W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 6000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 237.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.3% in PassMark G3D (2,692 vs 2,607), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 6000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 8770 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $4,249 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $4,399, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2740.1% (17.4 vs 0.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 8770 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 6000 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 6000 vs Radeon HD 8770 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 6000

The Quadro 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 10 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,692 points. Launch price was $4,399.

Radeon HD 8770

The Radeon HD 8770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 775 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,607 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 6000 scores 2,692 and the Radeon HD 8770 reaches 2,607 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 6000 is built on Fermi while the Radeon HD 8770 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 448 (Quadro 6000) vs 384 (Radeon HD 8770). Raw compute: 1.028 TFLOPS (Quadro 6000) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8770).

Feature	Quadro 6000	Radeon HD 8770
G3D Mark Score	2,692+3%	2,607
Architecture	Fermi	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	448+17%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.028 TFLOPS+62%	0.6336 TFLOPS
ROPs	48+500%	8
TMUs	56+133%	24
L1 Cache	896 KB+833%	96 KB
L2 Cache	768 KB+200%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 6000	Radeon HD 8770
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 6000 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8770 carries 2 GB. Quadro 6000 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 6000 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8770. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Quadro 6000) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 8770) — the Quadro 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 6000	Radeon HD 8770
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+200%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	768 KB+200%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 6000 draws 204W versus the Radeon HD 8770's 50W — a 121.3% difference. The Radeon HD 8770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 6000) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8770). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro 6000	Radeon HD 8770
TDP	204W	50W-75%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	—	240mm
Slots	—	2
Perf/Watt	13.2	52.1+295%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro 6000 came in at $4399, while the Radeon HD 8770 launched at $150. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8770 was 96.6% cheaper ($4249 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.6 (Quadro 6000) vs 17.4 (Radeon HD 8770) — the Radeon HD 8770 offers 2800% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 8770 (2013 vs 2010).

Feature	Quadro 6000	Radeon HD 8770
MSRP	$4399	$150-97%
Performance per Dollar	0.6	17.4+2800%
Codename	GF100	Mars
Release	December 10 2010	April 1 2013
Ranking	#615	#844

Search Quadro 6000 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 8770 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.