Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro W4300 vs Radeon HD 8770

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro W4300

2015Core: 930 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 8770

2013Core: 775 MHzBoost: 825 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

FirePro W4300 vs Radeon HD 8770 Performance Spectrum

FirePro W4300
4 GB 50
2,719
+4.3%
brand logoRadeon Vega 10
brand logoRadeon R9 M360
brand logoRadeon R9 M385
brand logoRadeon RX 550X
brand logoRadeon RX 6500M
brand logoRadeon RX 7400
brand logoRadeon RX 7800M
brand logoRadeon RX 6750 XT
Radeon HD 8770
2 GB 50
2,607
0.0%
brand logoRadeon R7 M370
brand logoRadeon HD 5830
brand logoRadeon R9 350
brand logoRadeon HD 5970
brand logoRadeon RX 6500M
brand logoRadeon RX 7400
brand logoRadeon RX 7800M
brand logoRadeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W4300 vs Radeon HD 8770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W4300

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • ✅Measures 171mm instead of 240mm, a 69mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
  • ✅More future proof: GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    152.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $379 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 17.4 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Radeon HD 8770

2013

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $229 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 142.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.4 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌40.4% longer card at 240mm vs 171mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro W4300 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4.3% in PassMark G3D (2,719 vs 2,607), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro W4300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 8770 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $229 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $379, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 142.3% (17.4 vs 7.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 8770 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro W4300 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro W4300 vs Radeon HD 8770 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W4300

The FirePro W4300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 8770

The Radeon HD 8770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 775 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,607 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W4300 scores 2,719 and the Radeon HD 8770 reaches 2,607 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W4300 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon HD 8770 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W4300) vs 384 (Radeon HD 8770). Raw compute: 1.428 TFLOPS (FirePro W4300) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8770).

FeatureFirePro W4300Radeon HD 8770
G3D Mark Score
2,719+4%
2,607
Architecture
GCN 2.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
768+100%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.428 TFLOPS+125%
0.6336 TFLOPS
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
48+100%
24
L1 Cache
192 KB+100%
96 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W4300Radeon HD 8770
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W4300 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8770 carries 2 GB. FirePro W4300 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W4300 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8770.

FeatureFirePro W4300Radeon HD 8770
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W4300) vs 12_0 (Radeon HD 8770). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro W4300Radeon HD 8770
DirectX
12
12_0
Max Displays
6+100%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W4300) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon HD 8770). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 4.0.

FeatureFirePro W4300Radeon HD 8770
Encoder
VCE 2.0
VCE 2.0
Decoder
UVD 4.2
UVD 4.0
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
—
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W4300 draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 8770's 50W — a 0% difference. The Radeon HD 8770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W4300) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8770). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 171mm vs 240mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

FeatureFirePro W4300Radeon HD 8770
TDP
50W
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
171mm
240mm
Height
69mm
—
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
71°C
—
Perf/Watt
54.4+4%
52.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro W4300 came in at $379, while the Radeon HD 8770 launched at $150. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8770 was 60.4% cheaper ($229 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.2 (FirePro W4300) vs 17.4 (Radeon HD 8770) — the Radeon HD 8770 offers 141.7% better value. The newer card here is FirePro W4300 (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureFirePro W4300Radeon HD 8770
MSRP
$379
$150-60%
Performance per Dollar
7.2
17.4+142%
Codename
Bonaire
Mars
Release
December 1 2015
April 1 2013
Ranking
#590
#844
Search FirePro W4300 on AmazonSearch Radeon HD 8770 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.