
Radeon HD 8770 vs Radeon RX 550

Radeon HD 8770
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 550
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon HD 8770 is positioned at rank #271 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8770
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 550 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8770.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8770 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 550 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX 550 holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $150), it costs 77% less, resulting in a 339.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8770 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+339.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($35) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8770 and Radeon RX 550

Radeon HD 8770
The Radeon HD 8770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 775 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,607 points.

Radeon RX 550
The Radeon RX 550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,674 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8770 scores 2,607 and the Radeon RX 550 reaches 2,674 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8770 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon RX 550 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon HD 8770) vs 512 (Radeon RX 550). Raw compute: 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8770) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550). Boost clocks: 825 MHz vs 1183 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8770 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,607 | 2,674+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6336 TFLOPS | 1.211 TFLOPS+91% |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | 1183 MHz+43% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 128 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8770 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 8770 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 550 has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 550 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 96 GB/s (Radeon HD 8770) vs 112 GB/s (Radeon RX 550) — a 16.7% advantage for the Radeon RX 550. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 8770) vs 512 KB (Radeon RX 550) — the Radeon RX 550 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8770 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 112 GB/s+17% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon HD 8770) vs 12_0 (Radeon RX 550). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8770 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon HD 8770) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 550). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8770 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8770 draws 50W versus the Radeon RX 550's 50W — a 0% difference. The Radeon RX 550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8770) vs 300W (Radeon RX 550). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 240mm vs 155mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8770 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 240mm | 155mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 52.1 | 53.5+3% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8770 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon RX 550 launched at $79 and now averages $35. The Radeon RX 550 costs 76.7% less ($115 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.4 (Radeon HD 8770) vs 76.4 (Radeon RX 550) — the Radeon RX 550 offers 339.1% better value. The Radeon RX 550 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8770 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $79-47% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $35-77% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.4 | 76.4+339% |
| Codename | Mars | Lexa |
| Release | April 1 2013 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #844 | #617 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















