GRID M10-2Q vs Radeon HD 8770

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M10-2Q vs Radeon HD 8770 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID M10-2Q vs Radeon HD 8770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M10-2Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Measures 1mm instead of 240mm, a 239mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1566.7% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.1 vs 17.4 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.

Radeon HD 8770

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,350 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1514% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.4 vs 1.1 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌23900% longer card at 240mm vs 1mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID M10-2Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.3% in PassMark G3D (2,692 vs 2,607), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID M10-2Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 8770 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,350 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $2,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1514% (17.4 vs 1.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 8770 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID M10-2Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID M10-2Q vs Radeon HD 8770 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M10-2Q

The GRID M10-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,692 points.

Radeon HD 8770

The Radeon HD 8770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 775 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,607 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M10-2Q scores 2,692 and the Radeon HD 8770 reaches 2,607 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon HD 8770 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M10-2Q) vs 384 (Radeon HD 8770). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-2Q) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8770). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 825 MHz.

Feature	GRID M10-2Q	Radeon HD 8770
G3D Mark Score	2,692+3%	2,607
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2048+433%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.825 TFLOPS+662%	0.6336 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1178 MHz+43%	825 MHz
ROPs	64+700%	8
TMUs	128+433%	24
L1 Cache	768 KB+700%	96 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID M10-2Q	Radeon HD 8770
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M10-2Q and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8770. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-2Q) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 8770) — the GRID M10-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID M10-2Q	Radeon HD 8770
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M10-2Q) vs 12_0 (Radeon HD 8770). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.

Feature	GRID M10-2Q	Radeon HD 8770
DirectX	12_1	12_0
Max Displays	0	3

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M10-2Q draws 225W versus the Radeon HD 8770's 50W — a 127.3% difference. The Radeon HD 8770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-2Q) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8770). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 240mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GRID M10-2Q	Radeon HD 8770
TDP	225W	50W-78%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	1mm	240mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Perf/Watt	12.0	52.1+334%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M10-2Q came in at $2500, while the Radeon HD 8770 launched at $150. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8770 was 94% cheaper ($2350 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.1 (GRID M10-2Q) vs 17.4 (Radeon HD 8770) — the Radeon HD 8770 offers 1481.8% better value. The newer card here is GRID M10-2Q (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	GRID M10-2Q	Radeon HD 8770
MSRP	$2500	$150-94%
Performance per Dollar	1.1	17.4+1482%
Codename	GM204	Mars
Release	August 30 2015	April 1 2013
Ranking	#433	#844

Search GRID M10-2Q on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 8770 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.