
FirePro V9800

Radeon Pro WX 4150
FirePro V9800 vs Radeon Pro WX 4150 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro V9800 vs Radeon Pro WX 4150 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro V9800 vs Radeon Pro WX 4150: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro V9800
2011Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌1066.3% HIGHER MSRP$3,499 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.8 vs 8.8 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.
Radeon Pro WX 4150
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,199 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1030% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.8 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V9800 vs Radeon Pro WX 4150 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V9800
The FirePro V9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,727 points.

Radeon Pro WX 4150
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,642 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V9800 scores 2,727 and the Radeon Pro WX 4150 reaches 2,642 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V9800 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V9800) vs 896 (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V9800) vs 1.887 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4150).
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,727+3% | 2,642 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+43% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.856 TFLOPS | 1.887 TFLOPS+2% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+43% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+43% | 224 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V9800 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 4150. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro V9800) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4150) — the Radeon Pro WX 4150 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro V9800) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12 (12_0)+7% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro V9800) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V9800) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 4150).
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 3.4 (Polaris) |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V9800 draws 150W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4150's 50W — a 100% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V9800) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 50W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 18.2 | 52.8+190% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro V9800 came in at $3499, while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon Pro WX 4150 was 91.4% cheaper ($3199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.8 (FirePro V9800) vs 8.8 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) — the Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers 1000% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 4150 (2017 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3499 | $300-91% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.8 | 8.8+1000% |
| Codename | Cayman | Baffin |
| Release | May 24 2011 | March 1 2017 |
| Ranking | #656 | #620 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















