A10 PRO-7800B vs Celeron N5100

A10 PRO-7800B vs Celeron N5100 Performance Spectrum

A10 PRO-7800B

4 / 4

3,317

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron N5100

4 / 4

3,305

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10 PRO-7800B vs Celeron N5100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10 PRO-7800B vs Celeron N5100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10 PRO-7800B

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Celeron N5100 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron N5100.

Trade-offs

❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.

Celeron N5100

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10 PRO-7800B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,305 vs 3,317).
❌No integrated graphics, while A10 PRO-7800B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10 PRO-7800B.

Quick Answers

So, is A10 PRO-7800B better than Celeron N5100?

Yes. A10 PRO-7800B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 10.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10 PRO-7800B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10 PRO-7800B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10 PRO-7800B still makes the most sense overall. A10 PRO-7800B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N5100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10 PRO-7800B vs Celeron N5100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10 PRO-7800B

The A10 PRO-7800B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,317 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron N5100

The Celeron N5100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,305 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A10 PRO-7800B and Celeron N5100 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the A10 PRO-7800B versus 2.8 GHz on the Celeron N5100 — a 32.8% clock advantage for the A10 PRO-7800B (base: 3.5 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The A10 PRO-7800B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron N5100 uses Jasper Lake (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the A10 PRO-7800B scores 3,317 against the Celeron N5100's 3,305 — a 0.4% lead for the A10 PRO-7800B.

Feature	A10 PRO-7800B	Celeron N5100
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+39%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+218%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+167%	1.5 MB (total)
Process	28 nm	10 nm-64%
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Jasper Lake (2021)
PassMark	3,317	3,305
Geekbench 6 Single	446	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10 PRO-7800B uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N5100 uses BGA1338 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10 PRO-7800B	Celeron N5100
Socket	FM2+	BGA1338
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10 PRO-7800B) / not specified (Celeron N5100). The A10 PRO-7800B includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Celeron N5100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10 PRO-7800B targets Business Desktop. Direct competitor: A10 PRO-7800B rivals Core i3-4160.