A10 PRO-7800B vs Xeon X5570

A10 PRO-7800B vs Xeon X5570 Performance Spectrum

A10 PRO-7800B

4 / 4

3,317

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon X5570

4 / 8

3,306

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10 PRO-7800B vs Xeon X5570 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10 PRO-7800B vs Xeon X5570: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10 PRO-7800B

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Xeon X5570 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon X5570.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5570, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.

Xeon X5570

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,306 vs 3,317).
❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10 PRO-7800B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10 PRO-7800B.

Quick Answers

So, is A10 PRO-7800B better than Xeon X5570?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5570 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A10 PRO-7800B is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10 PRO-7800B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10 PRO-7800B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10 PRO-7800B still makes the most sense overall. A10 PRO-7800B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10 PRO-7800B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10 PRO-7800B vs Xeon X5570 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10 PRO-7800B

The A10 PRO-7800B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,317 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon X5570

The Xeon X5570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Gainestown (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,306 points. Launch price was $49.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10 PRO-7800B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon X5570's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the A10 PRO-7800B versus 3.33 GHz on the Xeon X5570 — a 15.8% clock advantage for the A10 PRO-7800B (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.93 GHz). The A10 PRO-7800B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon X5570 uses Gainestown (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10 PRO-7800B scores 3,317 against the Xeon X5570's 3,306 — a 0.3% lead for the A10 PRO-7800B.

Feature	A10 PRO-7800B	Xeon X5570
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+17%	3.33 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+19%	2.93 GHz
L3 Cache	—	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Gainestown (2009−2010)
PassMark	3,317	3,306
Geekbench 6 Single	446	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10 PRO-7800B uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5570 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-2133 on the A10 PRO-7800B versus DDR3-1333 on the Xeon X5570 — the A10 PRO-7800B supports 60% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 2 (A10 PRO-7800B) vs 3 (Xeon X5570). Chipset compatibility: A55,A58,A68H,A75,A78,A88X (A10 PRO-7800B) and Intel X58,Intel 5520 (Xeon X5570).

Feature	A10 PRO-7800B	Xeon X5570
Socket	FM2+	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-2133+60%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	3+50%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10 PRO-7800B) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5570). The A10 PRO-7800B includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Xeon X5570 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10 PRO-7800B targets Business Desktop, Xeon X5570 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: A10 PRO-7800B rivals Core i3-4160; Xeon X5570 rivals Core i3-2100.