A10 PRO-7800B
VS
Xeon X3470

A10 PRO-7800B vs Xeon X3470

AMD

A10 PRO-7800B

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Xeon X3470

4 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10 PRO-7800B is positioned at rank 320 and the Xeon X3470 is on rank 976, so the A10 PRO-7800B offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A10 PRO-7800B

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
4699%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
4440%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3224%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
971%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
769%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
673%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
385%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
380%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
346%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
346%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
342%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
333%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
329%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
327%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
324%
#289
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
MSRP: $108|Avg: $70
100%
#290
Core i9-10900KF
MSRP: $509|Avg: $336
100%
#291
Core i9-14900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $577
100%
#292
Core i5-13500T
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
100%
#293
Core i3-10300
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $140.49
100%
#294
Core i9-10900F
MSRP: $464|Avg: $300
99%
#295
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
MSRP: $449|Avg: $429
99%
#296
Core i7-9700F
MSRP: $323|Avg: $200
99%
#297
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1419
99%
#298
Core i5-9500F
MSRP: $187|Avg: $154
98%
#299
Core i9-11900KB
MSRP: $539|Avg: $350
98%
#300
Core i7-10700F
MSRP: $310|Avg: $250
97%
#320
A10 PRO-7800B
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon X3470

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
36653%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
6920%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
6149%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
4750%
#536
Xeon W-3265M
MSRP: $6300|Avg: $3500
99%
#976
Xeon X3470
MSRP: $589|Avg: $16
100%
#979
Xeon E5-2689
MSRP: $1800|Avg: $18
97%
#980
Xeon E5-2450L
MSRP: $1106|Avg: $78
96%
#981
Xeon X3480
MSRP: $612|Avg: $48
96%
#982
Xeon E5-2687W
MSRP: $1885|Avg: $70
94%
#983
Xeon E5-4610
MSRP: $1219|Avg: $50
93%
#985
Xeon X7550
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $1400
93%
#986
Xeon E7540
MSRP: $1980|Avg: $146
92%
#987
Xeon E7530
MSRP: $1391|Avg: $146
92%
#988
Xeon E5-4627 v4
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $200
92%
#989
Xeon E5-4627 v3
MSRP: $2225|Avg: $200
90%
#990
Xeon X5660
MSRP: $1219|Avg: $10
86%
#991
Xeon E5-2667
MSRP: $1552|Avg: $31
85%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($16) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon X3470 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightA10 PRO-7800BXeon X3470
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($16)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Lynnfield (2009−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The A10 PRO-7800B ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($16 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightA10 PRO-7800BXeon X3470
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($16)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A10 PRO-7800B and Xeon X3470

AMD

A10 PRO-7800B

The A10 PRO-7800B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,317 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Xeon X3470

The Xeon X3470 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,341 points. Launch price was $589.

Processing Power

The A10 PRO-7800B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon X3470's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the A10 PRO-7800B versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon X3470 — a 8% clock advantage for the A10 PRO-7800B (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.93 GHz). The A10 PRO-7800B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon X3470 uses Lynnfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10 PRO-7800B scores 3,317 against the Xeon X3470's 3,341 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon X3470.

FeatureA10 PRO-7800BXeon X3470
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz+8%
3.6 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+19%
2.93 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4096 kB+1500%
256 kB (per core)
Process
28 nm-38%
45 nm
Architecture
Kaveri (2014−2015)
Lynnfield (2009−2010)
PassMark
3,317
3,341
Geekbench 6 Single
446
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10 PRO-7800B uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X3470 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureA10 PRO-7800BXeon X3470
Socket
FM2+
LGA1156
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-2133
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10 PRO-7800B) / not specified (Xeon X3470). The A10 PRO-7800B includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Xeon X3470 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10 PRO-7800B targets Business Desktop. Direct competitor: A10 PRO-7800B rivals Core i3-4160.

FeatureA10 PRO-7800BXeon X3470
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R7
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Business Desktop