Core i3-4130 vs Opteron X3421

Core i3-4130 vs Opteron X3421 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-4130

2 / 4

3,334

+0.8%

3,306

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4130 vs Opteron X3421 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4130 vs Opteron X3421: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4130

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4400, while Opteron X3421 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Opteron X3421.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron X3421, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $117 MSRP, while Opteron X3421 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌260% higher power demand at 54W vs 15W.

Opteron X3421

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.
✅Draws 15W instead of 54W, a 39W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,306 vs 3,334).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4130 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-4130.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4130 better than Opteron X3421?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron X3421 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-4130 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4130 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4130 is the better buy right now. Core i3-4130 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $117 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (28.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Opteron X3421 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-4130 vs Opteron X3421 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4130

The Core i3-4130 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,334 points. Launch price was $120.

Opteron X3421

The Opteron X3421 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Excavator (2017−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,306 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-4130 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron X3421 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Opteron X3421 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i3-4130 versus 3.4 GHz on the Opteron X3421 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i3-4130 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Opteron X3421 uses Excavator (2017−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4130 scores 3,334 against the Opteron X3421's 3,306 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i3-4130.

Feature	Core i3-4130	Opteron X3421
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+62%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	2 MB (total)+700%
Process	22 nm-21%	28 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Excavator (2017−2018)
PassMark	3,334	3,306
Cinebench R23 Multi	2,036	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,046	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4130 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron X3421 uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-4130	Opteron X3421
Socket	LGA1150	FP4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Core i3-4130) / not specified (Opteron X3421). The Core i3-4130 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4400), while the Opteron X3421 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4130 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-4130 rivals FX-4130.