
Core i3-4170

Pentium G4600
Core i3-4170 vs Pentium G4600 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-4170 vs Pentium G4600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-4170 vs Pentium G4600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-4170
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4400, while Pentium G4600 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Pentium G4600.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,626 vs 3,629).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 31.0 vs 44.3 PassMark/$ ($117 MSRP vs $82 MSRP).
Pentium G4600
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $35 less on MSRP ($82 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 42.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.3 vs 31.0 PassMark/$ ($82 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 51W instead of 54W, a 3W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-4170 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4170 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-4170.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium G4600 better than Core i3-4170?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-4170 vs Pentium G4600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4170
The Core i3-4170 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,626 points. Launch price was $117.

Pentium G4600
The Pentium G4600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133/2400, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,629 points. Launch price was $87.
Processing Power
Both the Core i3-4170 and Pentium G4600 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i3-4170 versus 3.6 GHz on the Pentium G4600 — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-4170 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i3-4170 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium G4600 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4170 scores 3,626 against the Pentium G4600's 3,629 — a 0.1% lead for the Pentium G4600. Both processors carry 3 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i3-4170 | Pentium G4600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+3% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+3% | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 3,626 | 3,629 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,140 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,897 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-4170 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium G4600 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-4170 | Pentium G4600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4170) / not specified (Pentium G4600). The Core i3-4170 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4400), while the Pentium G4600 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i3-4170 | Pentium G4600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4400 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-4170 was priced at $117, while the Pentium G4600 came in at $82. On launch pricing ($117 vs $82), Pentium G4600 was $35 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-4170 delivers 31.0 pts/$ vs 44.3 pts/$ for the Pentium G4600 — making the Pentium G4600 the 35.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-4170 | Pentium G4600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $117 | $82-30% |
| Performance per Dollar | 31.0 | 44.3+43% |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














