
Core i3-4350

Pentium Dual Core T3200
Core i3-4350 vs Pentium Dual Core T3200 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-4350 vs Pentium Dual Core T3200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-4350 vs Pentium Dual Core T3200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-4350
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4600, while Pentium Dual Core T3200 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Pentium Dual Core T3200.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 26.2 vs 56.3 PassMark/$ ($138 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).
- ❌5300% higher power demand at 54W vs 1W.
Pentium Dual Core T3200
2008Why buy it
- ✅Costs $74 less on MSRP ($64 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 115.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 56.3 vs 26.2 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 54W, a 53W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-4350 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (408 vs 1,827).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4350 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-4350.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-4350 better than Pentium Dual Core T3200?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-4350 vs Pentium Dual Core T3200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4350
The Core i3-4350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,611 points. Launch price was $170.

Pentium Dual Core T3200
The Pentium Dual Core T3200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 3,600 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i3-4350 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium Dual Core T3200's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i3-4350 versus 2 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T3200 — a 57.1% clock advantage for the Core i3-4350. The Core i3-4350 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium Dual Core T3200 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4350 scores 3,611 against the Pentium Dual Core T3200's 3,600 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i3-4350. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 951 vs 235, a 120.7% lead for the Core i3-4350 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,827 vs 408 (127% advantage for the Core i3-4350).
| Feature | Core i3-4350 | Pentium Dual Core T3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz+80% | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 1 MB+300% |
| Process | 22 nm-66% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | NetBurst (2000−2006) |
| PassMark | 3,611 | 3,600 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 951+305% | 235 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,827+348% | 408 |
Memory & Platform
Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4350 versus DDR2-667 on the Pentium Dual Core T3200 — the Core i3-4350 supports 139.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-4350 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-4350) vs 0 (Pentium Dual Core T3200) — the Core i3-4350 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Core i3-4350) and PM965,GM965,GL960 (Pentium Dual Core T3200).
| Feature | Core i3-4350 | Pentium Dual Core T3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | — |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600+140% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+700% | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x (Core i3-4350) vs No (Pentium Dual Core T3200). The Core i3-4350 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4600), while the Pentium Dual Core T3200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4350 targets Office Desktop.
| Feature | Core i3-4350 | Pentium Dual Core T3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | No |
| Target Use | Office Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-4350 was priced at $138, while the Pentium Dual Core T3200 came in at $64. On launch pricing ($138 vs $64), Pentium Dual Core T3200 was $74 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-4350 delivers 26.2 pts/$ vs 56.3 pts/$ for the Pentium Dual Core T3200 — making the Pentium Dual Core T3200 the 73% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-4350 | Pentium Dual Core T3200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $138 | $64-54% |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.2 | 56.3+115% |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2008 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















