Core i3-5010U vs Pro A10-8700B

Core i3-5010U vs Pro A10-8700B Performance Spectrum

Core i3-5010U

2 / 4

2,157

0.0%

2,170

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-5010U vs Pro A10-8700B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-5010U vs Pro A10-8700B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-5010U

2015

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 5500, while Pro A10-8700B needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,157 vs 2,170).
❌25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.

Pro A10-8700B

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-5010U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pro A10-8700B better than Core i3-5010U?

Yes. Pro A10-8700B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pro A10-8700B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pro A10-8700B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pro A10-8700B still makes the most sense overall. Pro A10-8700B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pro A10-8700B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-5010U vs Pro A10-8700B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-5010U

The Core i3-5010U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,157 points. Launch price was $281.

Pro A10-8700B

The Pro A10-8700B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3/DDR3L-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,170 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-5010U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Pro A10-8700B offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pro A10-8700B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Core i3-5010U versus 3.2 GHz on the Pro A10-8700B — a 41.5% clock advantage for the Pro A10-8700B (base: 2.1 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i3-5010U uses the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Pro A10-8700B uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-5010U scores 2,157 against the Pro A10-8700B's 2,170 — a 0.6% lead for the Pro A10-8700B.

Feature	Core i3-5010U	Pro A10-8700B
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.1 GHz	3.2 GHz+52%
Base Clock	2.1 GHz+17%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	2048 kB+700%
Process	14 nm-50%	28 nm
Architecture	Broadwell-U (2015)	Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark	2,157	2,170
Geekbench 6 Single	737	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-5010U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pro A10-8700B uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-5010U	Pro A10-8700B
Socket	FCBGA1168	FP4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-5010U) / not specified (Pro A10-8700B). The Core i3-5010U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 5500), while the Pro A10-8700B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-5010U targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-5010U rivals A10-8700P.