Core i3-5015U vs Celeron M 560
Core i3-5015U
Celeron M 560
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-5015U is positioned at rank 648 and the Celeron M 560 is on rank 819, so the Core i3-5015U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-5015U
Performance Per Dollar Celeron M 560
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i3-5015U | Celeron M 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-U (2015) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i3-5015U | Celeron M 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-5015U and Celeron M 560
Core i3-5015U
The Core i3-5015U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,990 points. Launch price was $275.
Celeron M 560
The Celeron M 560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.13 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,008 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i3-5015U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron M 560 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Core i3-5015U has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Core i3-5015U versus 2.13 GHz on the Celeron M 560 — a 1.4% clock advantage for the Celeron M 560. The Core i3-5015U uses the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron M 560 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-5015U scores 1,990 against the Celeron M 560's 2,008 — a 0.9% lead for the Celeron M 560.
| Feature | Core i3-5015U | Celeron M 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4+100% | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.13 GHz+1% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB+300% |
| Process | 14 nm-78% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Broadwell-U (2015) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,990 | 2,008 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-5015U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron M 560 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Core i3-5015U versus 667 on the Celeron M 560 — the Celeron M 560 supports 198.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-5015U supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i3-5015U) vs 0 (Celeron M 560) — the Core i3-5015U offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i3-5015U | Celeron M 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1168 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1600 | 667+22133% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+419430300% | 4 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-5015U) vs false (Celeron M 560). The Core i3-5015U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 5500), while the Celeron M 560 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-5015U targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron M 560 rivals Mobile Sempron 3600+.
| Feature | Core i3-5015U | Celeron M 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 5500 | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | false |
| Target Use | Mobile | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i3-5015U and Celeron M 560
