Core i3-5020U
VS
Celeron G3930TE

Core i3-5020U vs Celeron G3930TE

Intel

Core i3-5020U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Celeron G3930TE

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-5020U is positioned at rank 598 and the Celeron G3930TE is on rank 403, so the Celeron G3930TE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-5020U

#184
Core Ultra 7 266V
MSRP: $520|Avg: $520
100%
#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
98%
#586
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
789%
#587
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
777%
#588
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
713%
#589
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
710%
#590
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
704%
#592
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
680%
#593
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
652%
#594
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
651%
#595
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
633%
#598
Core i3-5020U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#608
Ryzen AI 5 330
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G3930TE

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
5903%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5577%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4050%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1220%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
966%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
845%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
484%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
478%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
435%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
435%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
430%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
419%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
413%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
411%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
407%
#226
Ryzen 5 1600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $144
99%
#334
Core i3-9100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $125
100%
#335
Core i9-10900X
MSRP: $590|Avg: $425
100%
#336
Core i7-8700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $196
99%
#337
Ryzen 5 3600XT
MSRP: $249|Avg: $357
98%
#338
Core i9-10980XE
MSRP: $979|Avg: $620
98%
#339
Core i5-8500T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $149
98%
#340
Core i9-9900KF
MSRP: $488|Avg: $350
98%
#341
Ryzen Embedded V2748
MSRP: $309|Avg: $359
97%
#403
Celeron G3930TE
MSRP: $42|Avg: $29
100%
#411
Core i3-8100
MSRP: $117|Avg: $45
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron G3930TE (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2133, DDR3L-1600, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i3-5020UCeleron G3930TE
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($29)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-U (2015) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i3-5020U (2015) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i3-5020UCeleron G3930TE
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($29)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-5020U and Celeron G3930TE

Intel

Core i3-5020U

The Core i3-5020U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,232 points. Launch price was $281.

Intel

Celeron G3930TE

The Celeron G3930TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133, DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,218 points. Launch price was $42.

Processing Power

The Core i3-5020U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron G3930TE's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Core i3-5020U versus 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G3930TE — a 20.4% clock advantage for the Celeron G3930TE (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i3-5020U uses the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron G3930TE uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-5020U scores 2,232 against the Celeron G3930TE's 2,218 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i3-5020U. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 600 vs 548, a 9.1% lead for the Core i3-5020U that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,200 vs 948 (23.5% advantage for the Core i3-5020U). L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-5020U vs 2 MB on the Celeron G3930TE.

FeatureCore i3-5020UCeleron G3930TE
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
2.7 GHz+23%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
2.7 GHz+23%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)+50%
2 MB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Broadwell-U (2015)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
2,232
2,218
Geekbench 6 Single
600+9%
548
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,200+27%
948
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-5020U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G3930TE uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Core i3-5020U versus DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G3930TE — the Celeron G3930TE supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3930TE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i3-5020U) vs 16 (Celeron G3930TE) — the Celeron G3930TE offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Broadwell-U (Core i3-5020U) and H110,B250,H270,Z270 (Celeron G3930TE).

FeatureCore i3-5020UCeleron G3930TE
Socket
FCBGA1168
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
DDR4-2400+33%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
64 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
16+33%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-5020U) vs VT-x (Celeron G3930TE). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 5500 (Core i3-5020U) and HD Graphics 610 (Celeron G3930TE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-5020U targets Mainstream Laptop, Celeron G3930TE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3930TE rivals Pentium G4560T.

FeatureCore i3-5020UCeleron G3930TE
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 5500
HD Graphics 610
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x
Target Use
Mainstream Laptop
Budget