Core i3-6100 vs Core i3-7100

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-6100 vs Core i3-7100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-6100 vs Core i3-7100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-6100

2015

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,270 vs 4,306).
❌
6.8% HIGHER MSRP
$125 MSRPvs$117 MSRP

Core i3-7100

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $8 less on MSRP ($117 MSRP vs $125 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-7100 better than Core i3-6100?

Yes. Core i3-7100 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-7100 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-7100 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-7100 is the better buy right now. Core i3-7100 comes in $8 cheaper on MSRP at $117 MSRP versus $125 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 7.7% better value on MSRP (36.8 vs 34.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-7100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-6100 vs Core i3-7100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-6100

The Core i3-6100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,270 points. Launch price was $117.

Core i3-7100

The Core i3-7100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,306 points. Launch price was $117.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-6100 and Core i3-7100 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i3-6100 versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-7100 — a 5.3% clock advantage for the Core i3-7100 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Core i3-6100 uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-7100 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-6100 scores 4,270 against the Core i3-7100's 4,306 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i3-7100. Both processors carry 3 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i3-6100	Core i3-7100
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	3.9 GHz+5%
Base Clock	3.7 GHz	3.9 GHz+5%
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	4,270	4,306

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1151 socket with PCIe 3.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Core i3-6100 versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7100 — the Core i3-7100 supports 12.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	Core i3-6100	Core i3-7100
Socket	LGA1151	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	DDR4-2400+13%
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 530 (Core i3-6100) and HD Graphics 630 (Core i3-7100) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-6100 targets Desktop, Core i3-7100 targets Desktop.

Feature	Core i3-6100	Core i3-7100
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 530	HD Graphics 630
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Desktop	Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-6100 was priced at $125, while the Core i3-7100 came in at $117. On launch pricing ($125 vs $117), Core i3-7100 was $8 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-6100 delivers 34.2 pts/$ vs 36.8 pts/$ for the Core i3-7100 — making the Core i3-7100 the 7.5% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-6100	Core i3-7100
MSRP	$125	$117-6%
Performance per Dollar	34.2	36.8+8%
Release Date	2015	2017

Search Core i3-6100 on Amazon

Search Core i3-7100 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.