Core i3-6100U
VS
FX-4100

Core i3-6100U vs FX-4100

Intel

Core i3-6100U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2015
VS
AMD

FX-4100

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-6100U is positioned at rank 772 and the FX-4100 is on rank 728, so the FX-4100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-6100U

#760
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1115%
#761
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1099%
#762
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1009%
#763
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1004%
#764
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
995%
#766
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
961%
#767
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
921%
#768
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
920%
#769
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
895%
#772
Core i3-6100U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#773
Core i7-9750HF
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar FX-4100

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
13630%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
12879%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9351%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2817%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2231%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1952%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1118%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1103%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1005%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1005%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
993%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
967%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
953%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
949%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
941%
#728
FX-4100
MSRP: $115|Avg: $20
100%
#729
Core i5-7440EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $30
100%
#730
Core i5-3350P
MSRP: $189|Avg: $25
100%
#732
Core i3-4350T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $20
100%
#733
Athlon II X4 641
MSRP: $102|Avg: $102
99%
#734
Athlon II X3 460
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
99%
#735
Pentium G2100T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $10
99%
#736
Core i5-3330
MSRP: $182|Avg: $21
99%
#737
Core i3-4330T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
98%
#738
Pentium E5300
MSRP: $62|Avg: $25
98%
#739
Athlon II X2 215
MSRP: $45|Avg: $10
98%
#740
Core i7-4790S
MSRP: $312|Avg: $60
98%
#741
Pentium G2020T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $69
98%
#742
FX-6100
MSRP: $165|Avg: $25
98%
#743
Core i7-4771
MSRP: $320|Avg: $78
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The FX-4100 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i3-6100U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i3-6100UFX-4100
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i3-6100UFX-4100
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-6100U and FX-4100

Intel

Core i3-6100U

The Core i3-6100U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,631 points. Launch price was $281.

AMD

FX-4100

The FX-4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,630 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i3-6100U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-4100 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-4100 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Core i3-6100U versus 3.8 GHz on the FX-4100 — a 49.2% clock advantage for the FX-4100 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i3-6100U uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-4100 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-6100U scores 2,631 against the FX-4100's 2,630 — a 0% lead for the Core i3-6100U. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-6100U vs 8192 kB on the FX-4100.

FeatureCore i3-6100UFX-4100
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.3 GHz
3.8 GHz+65%
Base Clock
2.3 GHz
3.6 GHz+57%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8192 kB+167%
L2 Cache
512 kB
4096 kB+700%
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Skylake (2015−2016)
Zambezi (2011−2012)
PassMark
2,631
2,630
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-6100U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-4100 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-6100UFX-4100
Socket
BGA1356
AM3+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0