
Core i3-8100

Opteron 6344
Core i3-8100 vs Opteron 6344 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-8100 vs Opteron 6344 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-8100 vs Opteron 6344: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-8100
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $298 less on MSRP ($117 MSRP vs $415 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 254.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 51.9 vs 14.6 PassMark/$ ($117 MSRP vs $415 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 115W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6344 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6344, which brings 12 cores / 12 threads.
Opteron 6344
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 12 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,069 vs 6,073).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.6 vs 51.9 PassMark/$ ($415 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).
- ❌76.9% higher power demand at 115W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-8100 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-8100.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-8100 better than Opteron 6344?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-8100 vs Opteron 6344 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-8100
The Core i3-8100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 October 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 6,073 points. Launch price was $117.

Opteron 6344
The Opteron 6344 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,069 points. Launch price was $415.
Processing Power
The Core i3-8100 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 6344 offers 12 cores / 12 threads — the Opteron 6344 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i3-8100 versus 3.2 GHz on the Opteron 6344 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-8100 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i3-8100 uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Opteron 6344 uses Abu Dhabi (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-8100 scores 6,073 against the Opteron 6344's 6,069 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i3-8100. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-8100 vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6344.
| Feature | Core i3-8100 | Opteron 6344 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 12 / 12+200% |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz+12% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+38% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+12700% | 2 MB (per module) |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Abu Dhabi (2012) |
| PassMark | 6,073 | 6,069 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,200 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,600 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-8100 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6344 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-8100 | Opteron 6344 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | G34 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-8100) / not specified (Opteron 6344). The Core i3-8100 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 630), while the Opteron 6344 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-8100 targets Budget Desktop.
| Feature | Core i3-8100 | Opteron 6344 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Budget Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-8100 was priced at $117, while the Opteron 6344 came in at $415. On launch pricing ($117 vs $415), Core i3-8100 was $298 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-8100 delivers 51.9 pts/$ vs 14.6 pts/$ for the Opteron 6344 — making the Core i3-8100 the 112.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-8100 | Opteron 6344 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $117-72% | $415 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.9+255% | 14.6 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















