
Core i3-8100

Xeon E3-1225 v2
Core i3-8100 vs Xeon E3-1225 v2 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-8100 vs Xeon E3-1225 v2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-8100 vs Xeon E3-1225 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-8100
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 77W, a 12W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon E3-1225 v2 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Xeon E3-1225 v2.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $117 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1225 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E3-1225 v2
2012Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-8100 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,015 vs 6,073).
- ❌18.5% higher power demand at 77W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-8100 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-8100.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-8100 better than Xeon E3-1225 v2?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-8100 vs Xeon E3-1225 v2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-8100
The Core i3-8100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 October 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 6,073 points. Launch price was $117.

Xeon E3-1225 v2
The Xeon E3-1225 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Passmark benchmark score: 6,015 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i3-8100 is built on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i3-8100 scores 6,073 against the Xeon E3-1225 v2's 6,015 — a 1% lead for the Core i3-8100.
| Feature | Core i3-8100 | Xeon E3-1225 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | — |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | — |
| Process | 14 nm | — |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | — |
| PassMark | 6,073 | 6,015 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,200 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,600 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-8100) / not specified (Xeon E3-1225 v2). The Core i3-8100 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E3-1225 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-8100 targets Budget Desktop.
| Feature | Core i3-8100 | Xeon E3-1225 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Budget Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













