Core i3-8100 vs Xeon E3-1225 v2

Intel

Core i3-8100

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E3-1225 v2

Similar parts
·······

Core i3-8100 vs Xeon E3-1225 v2 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-8100 vs Xeon E3-1225 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-8100 vs Xeon E3-1225 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-8100

2017

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +6.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 65W instead of 77W, a 12W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon E3-1225 v2 needs a discrete GPU.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Xeon E3-1225 v2.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $117 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1225 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E3-1225 v2

2012

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-8100 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (6,015 vs 6,073).
    • 18.5% higher power demand at 77W vs 65W.
    • No integrated graphics, while Core i3-8100 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
    • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-8100.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core i3-8100 better than Xeon E3-1225 v2?
    Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1225 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-8100 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Core i3-8100 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-8100 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core i3-8100 is the better buy right now. Core i3-8100 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $117 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (51.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Core i3-8100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2012). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Core i3-8100 vs Xeon E3-1225 v2 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Core i3-8100

    The Core i3-8100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 October 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 6,073 points. Launch price was $117.

    Intel

    Xeon E3-1225 v2

    The Xeon E3-1225 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Passmark benchmark score: 6,015 points. Launch price was $800.

    Processing Power

    The Core i3-8100 is built on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i3-8100 scores 6,073 against the Xeon E3-1225 v2's 6,015 — a 1% lead for the Core i3-8100.

    FeatureCore i3-8100Xeon E3-1225 v2
    Cores / Threads
    4 / 4
    Boost Clock
    3.6 GHz
    Base Clock
    3.6 GHz
    L3 Cache
    6 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    256K (per core)
    Process
    14 nm
    Architecture
    Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
    PassMark
    6,073
    6,015
    Geekbench 6 Single
    1,200
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    3,600
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-8100) / not specified (Xeon E3-1225 v2). The Core i3-8100 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E3-1225 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-8100 targets Budget Desktop.

    FeatureCore i3-8100Xeon E3-1225 v2
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    Intel UHD Graphics 630
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-d
    Target Use
    Budget Desktop