
Core i3-9100T
Popular choices:

Core i7-4710HQ
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i3-9100T
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 47W, a 12W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $122 MSRP, while Core i7-4710HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4710HQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-4710HQ
2014Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Core i3-9100T needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-9100T across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,549 vs 5,600).
- ❌34.3% higher power demand at 47W vs 35W.
Core i3-9100T
2019Core i7-4710HQ
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 47W, a 12W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Core i3-9100T needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $122 MSRP, while Core i7-4710HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4710HQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-9100T across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,549 vs 5,600).
- ❌34.3% higher power demand at 47W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-9100T better than Core i7-4710HQ?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i3-9100T | Core i7-4710HQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i3-9100T | Core i7-4710HQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i3-9100T | Core i7-4710HQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 139 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i3-9100T | Core i7-4710HQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 139 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-9100T and Core i7-4710HQ

Core i3-9100T
Core i3-9100T
The Core i3-9100T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 5,600 points. Launch price was $122.

Core i7-4710HQ
Core i7-4710HQ
The Core i7-4710HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,549 points. Launch price was $378.
Processing Power
The Core i3-9100T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-4710HQ's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i3-9100T versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i7-4710HQ — a 5.6% clock advantage for the Core i3-9100T (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i3-9100T uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-4710HQ uses Crystalwell (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-9100T scores 5,600 against the Core i7-4710HQ's 5,549 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i3-9100T. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-9100T vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4710HQ.
| Feature | Core i3-9100T | Core i7-4710HQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+6% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+24% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Crystalwell (2013−2014) |
| PassMark | 5,600 | 5,549 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-9100T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4710HQ uses BGA1364 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-9100T | Core i7-4710HQ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | BGA1364 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3L-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i3-9100T) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-4710HQ). The Core i7-4710HQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Core i3-9100T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4710HQ targets Mobile.
| Feature | Core i3-9100T | Core i7-4710HQ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 4600 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













