
Core i3-9100T

Opteron 6274
Core i3-9100T vs Opteron 6274 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-9100T vs Opteron 6274 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

ARC Raiders

Civilization VI

Dead by Daylight

Left 4 Dead 2

Marvel Rivals
Core i3-9100T vs Opteron 6274: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-9100T
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $517 less on MSRP ($122 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 419.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 45.9 vs 8.8 PassMark/$ ($122 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 115W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6274 across 14 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,600 vs 5,643).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6274, which brings 16 cores / 16 threads.
Opteron 6274
2011Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.8% higher average FPS across 14 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.8 vs 45.9 PassMark/$ ($639 MSRP vs $122 MSRP).
- ❌228.6% higher power demand at 115W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Opteron 6274 better than Core i3-9100T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-9100T vs Opteron 6274 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-9100T
The Core i3-9100T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 5,600 points. Launch price was $122.

Opteron 6274
The Opteron 6274 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 8.00391 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,643 points. Launch price was $909.
Processing Power
The Core i3-9100T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 6274 offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Opteron 6274 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i3-9100T versus 3.1 GHz on the Opteron 6274 — a 17.6% clock advantage for the Core i3-9100T (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i3-9100T uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Opteron 6274 uses Interlagos (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-9100T scores 5,600 against the Opteron 6274's 5,643 — a 0.8% lead for the Opteron 6274. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-9100T vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6274.
| Feature | Core i3-9100T | Opteron 6274 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 16 / 16+300% |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+19% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+41% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+3098% | 8.00391 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Interlagos (2011−2012) |
| PassMark | 5,600 | 5,643 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-9100T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6274 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-9100T | Opteron 6274 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | G34 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-9100T was priced at $122, while the Opteron 6274 came in at $639. On launch pricing ($122 vs $639), Core i3-9100T was $517 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-9100T delivers 45.9 pts/$ vs 8.8 pts/$ for the Opteron 6274 — making the Core i3-9100T the 135.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-9100T | Opteron 6274 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $122-81% | $639 |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.9+422% | 8.8 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















