
Core i3-9100TE
Popular choices:

Core i5-4670T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i3-9100TE
2019Why buy it
- ✅+2.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $67 less on MSRP ($122 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 58.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.6 vs 23.7 PassMark/$ ($122 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-4670T across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Core i5-4670T
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,488 vs 4,589).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.7 vs 37.6 PassMark/$ ($189 MSRP vs $122 MSRP).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-9100TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i3-9100TE
2019Core i5-4670T
2013Why buy it
- ✅+2.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $67 less on MSRP ($122 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 58.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.6 vs 23.7 PassMark/$ ($122 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-4670T across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,488 vs 4,589).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.7 vs 37.6 PassMark/$ ($189 MSRP vs $122 MSRP).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-9100TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-9100TE better than Core i5-4670T?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i3-9100TE | Core i5-4670T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i3-9100TE | Core i5-4670T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 101 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 54 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i3-9100TE | Core i5-4670T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i3-9100TE | Core i5-4670T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-9100TE and Core i5-4670T

Core i3-9100TE
Core i3-9100TE
The Core i3-9100TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 4,589 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-4670T
Core i5-4670T
The Core i5-4670T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,488 points. Launch price was $220.
Processing Power
Both the Core i3-9100TE and Core i5-4670T share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-9100TE versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-4670T — a 3.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-4670T (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i3-9100TE uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-4670T uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-9100TE scores 4,589 against the Core i5-4670T's 4,488 — a 2.2% lead for the Core i3-9100TE. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-9100TE vs 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-4670T.
| Feature | Core i3-9100TE | Core i5-4670T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.3 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.3 GHz+5% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 6144 kB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 4,589+2% | 4,488 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-9100TE uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4670T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-9100TE | Core i5-4670T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Core i3-9100TE) / not specified (Core i5-4670T). The Core i3-9100TE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i5-4670T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-9100TE targets Embedded.
| Feature | Core i3-9100TE | Core i5-4670T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Embedded | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i3-9100TE launched at $122 MSRP, while the Core i5-4670T debuted at $189. On MSRP ($122 vs $189), the Core i3-9100TE is $67 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-9100TE delivers 37.6 pts/$ vs 23.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-4670T — making the Core i3-9100TE the 45.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-9100TE | Core i5-4670T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $122-35% | $189 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.6+59% | 23.7 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












