Atom C3758 vs Core i3-9100TE

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom C3758 vs Core i3-9100TE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom C3758 vs Core i3-9100TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom C3758

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Draws 25W instead of 35W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-9100TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i3-9100TE

2019

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Atom C3758 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Atom C3758 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,589 vs 4,614).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $122 MSRP, while Atom C3758 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌40% higher power demand at 35W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom C3758 better than Core i3-9100TE?

Yes. Atom C3758 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 17.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Atom C3758 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 17.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom C3758 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom C3758 is still the better call for a fresh build. Atom C3758 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $122 MSRP, and it still gives you a 17.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-9100TE only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 4,589 PassMark with 4 cores and 4 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-9100TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom C3758 vs Core i3-9100TE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom C3758

The Atom C3758 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2400. Passmark benchmark score: 4,614 points. Launch price was $193.

Core i3-9100TE

The Core i3-9100TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 4,589 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom C3758 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i3-9100TE offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom C3758 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Atom C3758 versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-9100TE — a 37% clock advantage for the Core i3-9100TE (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Atom C3758 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-9100TE uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3758 scores 4,614 against the Core i3-9100TE's 4,589 — a 0.5% lead for the Atom C3758. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Atom C3758 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-9100TE.

Feature	Atom C3758	Core i3-9100TE
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	3.2 GHz+45%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB+167%	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	16 MB	256K (per core)+1500%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Goldmont (2016−2017)	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
PassMark	4,614	4,589
Geekbench 6 Single	400	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,400	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom C3758 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-9100TE uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2400 memory speed. The Atom C3758 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	Atom C3758	Core i3-9100TE
Socket	FCBGA1310	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB+300%	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Atom C3758) vs VT-x (Core i3-9100TE). The Core i3-9100TE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Atom C3758 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Atom C3758 targets Server/Embedded, Core i3-9100TE targets Embedded.