
Atom C3758

Core i5-4460S
Atom C3758 vs Core i5-4460S Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Atom C3758 vs Core i5-4460S FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Atom C3758 vs Core i5-4460S: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Atom C3758
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 65W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (2,400 vs 2,614).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4460S can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-4460S.
Core i5-4460S
2014Why buy it
- ✅+8.9% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4600, while Atom C3758 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Atom C3758.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Atom C3758 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $182 MSRP, while Atom C3758 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌160% higher power demand at 65W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
So, is Atom C3758 better than Core i5-4460S?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom C3758 vs Core i5-4460S Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom C3758
The Atom C3758 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2400. Passmark benchmark score: 4,614 points. Launch price was $193.

Core i5-4460S
The Core i5-4460S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,645 points. Launch price was $182.
Processing Power
The Atom C3758 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i5-4460S offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom C3758 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Atom C3758 versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-4460S — a 42.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-4460S (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Atom C3758 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-4460S uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3758 scores 4,614 against the Core i5-4460S's 4,645 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i5-4460S. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 400 vs 847, a 71.7% lead for the Core i5-4460S that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,400 vs 2,614 (8.5% advantage for the Core i5-4460S). L3 cache: 16 MB on the Atom C3758 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-4460S.
| Feature | Atom C3758 | Core i5-4460S |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+100% | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.4 GHz+55% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.9 GHz+32% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB+167% | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+6300% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Goldmont (2016−2017) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 4,614 | 4,645 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 400 | 847+112% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,400 | 2,614+9% |
Memory & Platform
The Atom C3758 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4460S uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Atom C3758 versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i5-4460S — the Atom C3758 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3758 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Atom C3758) and H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Core i5-4460S).
| Feature | Atom C3758 | Core i5-4460S |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1310 | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400+50% | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+700% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Atom C3758) vs VT-x (Core i5-4460S). The Core i5-4460S includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4600), while the Atom C3758 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Atom C3758 targets Server/Embedded, Core i5-4460S targets Office Desktop.
| Feature | Atom C3758 | Core i5-4460S |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x |
| Target Use | Server/Embedded | Office Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













