Atom C3758 vs Core i5-3470

Intel

Atom C3758

8 Cores8 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i5-3470

4 Cores4 Thrd77 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······

Atom C3758 vs Core i5-3470 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom C3758 vs Core i5-3470 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom C3758 vs Core i5-3470: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom C3758

2017

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +17.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +166.7% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 6 MB).
  • Draws 25W instead of 77W, a 52W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (4,614 vs 4,663).

Core i5-3470

2012

Why buy it

  • +1.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Atom C3758 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $184 MSRP, while Atom C3758 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 208% higher power demand at 77W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom C3758 better than Core i5-3470?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Atom C3758 is ahead with a 17.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-3470 pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark. Atom C3758 also has the bigger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 6 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-3470 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Atom C3758 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Atom C3758 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $184 MSRP, and it still gives you a 17.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-3470 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (25.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom C3758 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2012) and 166.7% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 6 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom C3758 vs Core i5-3470 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Atom C3758

The Atom C3758 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2400. Passmark benchmark score: 4,614 points. Launch price was $193.

Intel

Core i5-3470

The Core i5-3470 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,663 points. Launch price was $184.

Processing Power

The Atom C3758 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i5-3470 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom C3758 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Atom C3758 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-3470 — a 48.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-3470 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Atom C3758 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-3470 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3758 scores 4,614 against the Core i5-3470's 4,663 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i5-3470. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Atom C3758 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-3470.

FeatureAtom C3758Core i5-3470
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+100%
4 / 4
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
3.6 GHz+64%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
3.2 GHz+45%
L3 Cache
16 MB+167%
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
16 MB
256K (per core)+1500%
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Goldmont (2016−2017)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
4,614
4,663+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
400
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,400
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom C3758 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-3470 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAtom C3758Core i5-3470
Socket
FCBGA1310
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Atom C3758) / not specified (Core i5-3470). Primary use case: Atom C3758 targets Server/Embedded.

FeatureAtom C3758Core i5-3470
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Server/Embedded