
Atom C3758

Core i3-1115GRE
Atom C3758 vs Core i3-1115GRE Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Atom C3758 vs Core i3-1115GRE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Atom C3758 vs Core i3-1115GRE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Atom C3758
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 25W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-1115GRE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i3-1115GRE
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 25W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics, while Atom C3758 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Atom C3758 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (2,233 vs 2,400).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $338 MSRP, while Atom C3758 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Atom C3758 better than Core i3-1115GRE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom C3758 vs Core i3-1115GRE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom C3758
The Atom C3758 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2400. Passmark benchmark score: 4,614 points. Launch price was $193.

Core i3-1115GRE
The Core i3-1115GRE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, LPDDR4X. Passmark benchmark score: 4,588 points. Launch price was $338.
Processing Power
The Atom C3758 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i3-1115GRE offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Atom C3758 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Atom C3758 versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-1115GRE — a 55.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-1115GRE (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Atom C3758 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-1115GRE uses Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3758 scores 4,614 against the Core i3-1115GRE's 4,588 — a 0.6% lead for the Atom C3758. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 400 vs 1,175, a 98.4% lead for the Core i3-1115GRE that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,400 vs 2,233 (7.2% advantage for the Atom C3758). L3 cache: 16 MB on the Atom C3758 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-1115GRE.
| Feature | Atom C3758 | Core i3-1115GRE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+300% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.9 GHz+77% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB+167% | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+1180% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Goldmont (2016−2017) | Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) |
| PassMark | 4,614 | 4,588 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 400 | 1,175+194% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,400+7% | 2,233 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom C3758 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-1115GRE uses FCBGA1449 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Atom C3758 versus DDR4-3200 on the Core i3-1115GRE — the Core i3-1115GRE supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3758 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Atom C3758) vs 4 (Core i3-1115GRE) — the Atom C3758 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Atom C3758) and SoC (Core i3-1115GRE).
| Feature | Atom C3758 | Core i3-1115GRE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1310 | FCBGA1449 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-3200+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+300% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+300% | 4 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i3-1115GRE supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Atom C3758) vs Yes (Core i3-1115GRE). The Core i3-1115GRE includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics), while the Atom C3758 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Atom C3758 targets Server/Embedded.
| Feature | Atom C3758 | Core i3-1115GRE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | Yes |
| Target Use | Server/Embedded | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













