Atom C3758
VS
Core i7-2600S

Atom C3758 vs Core i7-2600S

Intel

Atom C3758

8 Cores8 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core i7-2600S

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom C3758 is positioned at rank 585 and the Core i7-2600S is on rank 889, so the Atom C3758 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom C3758

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
9008%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1701%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1511%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1167%
#352
Xeon 6741P
MSRP: $4421|Avg: $3780
99%
#353
EPYC 7452
MSRP: $2025|Avg: $2025
98%
#354
EPYC 7502P
MSRP: $2300|Avg: $1299
96%
#355
Xeon w7-3455
MSRP: $2489|Avg: $2625
96%
#356
EPYC 9334
MSRP: $2990|Avg: $1810
95%
#357
Xeon w9-3575X
MSRP: $3789|Avg: $675
94%
#585
Atom C3758
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#590
Xeon W-2125
MSRP: $444|Avg: $42
98%
#592
EPYC 7261
MSRP: $501|Avg: $8
96%
#594
Xeon E5-1620 v2
MSRP: $294|Avg: $50
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2600S

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
19969%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
18869%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
13700%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4127%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3269%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2860%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1638%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1617%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1472%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1472%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1455%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1416%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1396%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1391%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1378%
#299
Core i9-7980XE
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $300
95%
#889
Core i7-2600S
MSRP: $297|Avg: $99
100%
#890
Athlon II X2 250e
MSRP: $77|Avg: $15
100%
#891
Athlon II X2 250u
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
100%
#892
Pentium G6951
MSRP: $89|Avg: $50
100%
#893
Core i3-2125
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
100%
#895
Celeron G1820
MSRP: $110|Avg: $15
99%
#896
Celeron E1600
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
99%
#897
Athlon II X2 270u
MSRP: $68|Avg: $10
98%
#898
Core i5-4570TE
MSRP: $202|Avg: $40
98%
#899
Core i3-2130
MSRP: $138|Avg: $138
96%
#902
Core i3-6100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $50
94%
#903
Core i3-4330TE
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
94%
#904
Pentium E5700
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom C3758 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4: 2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAtom C3758Core i7-2600S
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($99)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-2600S (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAtom C3758Core i7-2600S
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($99)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom C3758 and Core i7-2600S

Intel

Atom C3758

The Atom C3758 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2400. Passmark benchmark score: 4,614 points. Launch price was $193.

Intel

Core i7-2600S

The Core i7-2600S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,637 points. Launch price was $210.

Processing Power

The Atom C3758 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-2600S offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Atom C3758 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Atom C3758 versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-2600S — a 53.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-2600S (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Atom C3758 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-2600S uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3758 scores 4,614 against the Core i7-2600S's 4,637 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-2600S. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 400 vs 630, a 44.7% lead for the Core i7-2600S that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Atom C3758 vs 8192 kB (total) on the Core i7-2600S.

FeatureAtom C3758Core i7-2600S
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+100%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
3.8 GHz+73%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
2.8 GHz+27%
L3 Cache
16 MB+100%
8192 kB (total)
L2 Cache
16 MB+6300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Goldmont (2016−2017)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
4,614
4,637
Geekbench 6 Single
400
630+57%
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,400
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom C3758 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2600S uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Atom C3758 versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i7-2600S — the Atom C3758 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3758 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Atom C3758) and H61,H67,Z68,B75 (Core i7-2600S).

FeatureAtom C3758Core i7-2600S
Socket
FCBGA1310
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400+33%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB+700%
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Atom C3758) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2600S). The Core i7-2600S includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 2000), while the Atom C3758 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Atom C3758 targets Server/Embedded, Core i7-2600S targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-2600S rivals Phenom II X4 910e.

FeatureAtom C3758Core i7-2600S
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 2000
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Server/Embedded
Low Power Desktop