Atom C3758 vs FX-6350

Atom C3758 vs FX-6350 Performance Spectrum

Atom C3758

8 / 8

4,614

0.0%

4,640

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom C3758 vs FX-6350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom C3758 vs FX-6350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom C3758

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 25W instead of 125W, a 100W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,614 vs 4,640).

FX-6350

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Atom C3758 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $132 MSRP, while Atom C3758 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌400% higher power demand at 125W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom C3758 better than FX-6350?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Atom C3758 is ahead with a 8.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, FX-6350 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-6350 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom C3758 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Atom C3758 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $132 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. FX-6350 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (35.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3+.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom C3758 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom C3758 vs FX-6350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom C3758

The Atom C3758 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2400. Passmark benchmark score: 4,614 points. Launch price was $193.

FX-6350

The FX-6350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L2 cache: 6144 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,640 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom C3758 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the FX-6350 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Atom C3758 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Atom C3758 versus 4.2 GHz on the FX-6350 — a 62.5% clock advantage for the FX-6350 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Atom C3758 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-6350 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3758 scores 4,614 against the FX-6350's 4,640 — a 0.6% lead for the FX-6350.

Feature	Atom C3758	FX-6350
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+33%	6 / 6
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	4.2 GHz+91%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	3.9 GHz+77%
L3 Cache	16 MB	—
L2 Cache	16 MB+167%	6144 kB
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Goldmont (2016−2017)	Vishera (2012−2015)
PassMark	4,614	4,640
Geekbench 6 Single	400	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,400	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom C3758 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-6350 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Atom C3758	FX-6350
Socket	FCBGA1310	AM3+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—