
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE

Atom C3758
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE vs Atom C3758 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE vs Atom C3758 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE vs Atom C3758: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Vega 3, while Atom C3758 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Atom C3758 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $108 MSRP, while Atom C3758 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌40% higher power demand at 35W vs 25W.
Atom C3758
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 35W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,614 vs 4,633).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE better than Atom C3758?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE vs Atom C3758 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
The Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 4,633 points. Launch price was $149.

Atom C3758
The Atom C3758 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2400. Passmark benchmark score: 4,614 points. Launch price was $193.
Processing Power
The Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Atom C3758 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Atom C3758 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE versus 2.2 GHz on the Atom C3758 — a 42.9% clock advantage for the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Atom C3758 uses Goldmont (2016−2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE scores 4,633 against the Atom C3758's 4,614 — a 0.4% lead for the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE vs 16 MB on the Atom C3758.
| Feature | Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE | Atom C3758 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 8 / 8+300% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz+55% | 2.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+55% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 16 MB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 16 MB+3100% |
| Process | 12 nm-14% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Picasso (2019−2022) | Goldmont (2016−2017) |
| PassMark | 4,633 | 4,614 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 400 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 2,400 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom C3758 uses FCBGA1310 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2667 on the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE versus DDR4-2400 on the Atom C3758 — the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE supports 11.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3758 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE) vs 16 (Atom C3758) — the Atom C3758 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM4 (Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE) and SoC (Atom C3758).
| Feature | Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE | Atom C3758 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FCBGA1310 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2667+11% | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 256 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 16+100% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE) / VT-x, VT-d (Atom C3758). The Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Vega 3), while the Atom C3758 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Atom C3758 targets Server/Embedded.
| Feature | Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE | Atom C3758 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | — |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Server/Embedded |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















