Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE vs Core 2 Extreme QX9770

AMD

Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2020
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core 2 Extreme QX9770

4 Cores4 Thrd136 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2008
Similar parts
·······

Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE vs Core 2 Extreme QX9770 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE vs Core 2 Extreme QX9770 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE vs Core 2 Extreme QX9770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE

2020

Why buy it

  • +0.5% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $1,291 less on MSRP ($108 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1201.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 42.9 vs 3.3 PassMark/$ ($108 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
  • Draws 35W instead of 136W, a 101W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Vega 3, while Core 2 Extreme QX9770 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 2 Extreme QX9770 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Core 2 Extreme QX9770

2008

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +7.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (4,611 vs 4,633).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.3 vs 42.9 PassMark/$ ($1,399 MSRP vs $108 MSRP).
  • 288.6% higher power demand at 136W vs 35W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE better than Core 2 Extreme QX9770?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core 2 Extreme QX9770 is ahead with a 7.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE is the better buy right now. Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE comes in $1,291 cheaper on MSRP at $108 MSRP versus $1,399 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core 2 Extreme QX9770 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 7.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1201.6% better value on MSRP (42.9 vs 3.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE vs Core 2 Extreme QX9770 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE

The Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 4,633 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core 2 Extreme QX9770

The Core 2 Extreme QX9770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 12 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 136 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,611 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

The Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE versus 3.2 GHz on the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 uses Yorkfield (2007−2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE scores 4,633 against the Core 2 Extreme QX9770's 4,611 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Extreme QX9770.

FeatureAthlon Silver PRO 3125GECore 2 Extreme QX9770
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz+6%
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
3.4 GHz+6%
3.2 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
12 MB (total)+2300%
Process
12 nm-73%
45 nm
Architecture
Picasso (2019−2022)
Yorkfield (2007−2009)
PassMark
4,633
4,611
Cinebench R23 Multi
2,200
Geekbench 6 Single
451
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,583
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2667 on the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE versus DDR3-1600 on the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 — the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE) vs 16 (Core 2 Extreme QX9770) — the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM4 (Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE) and X48,X38,P45 (Core 2 Extreme QX9770).

FeatureAthlon Silver PRO 3125GECore 2 Extreme QX9770
Socket
AM4
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2667+67%
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+300%
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
Yes
No
PCIe Lanes
8
16+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE) / VT-x (Core 2 Extreme QX9770). The Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Vega 3), while the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Extreme QX9770 targets Enthusiast.

FeatureAthlon Silver PRO 3125GECore 2 Extreme QX9770
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon Vega 3
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Enthusiast
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE was priced at $108, while the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 came in at $1399. On launch pricing ($108 vs $1399), Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE was $1291 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE delivers 42.9 pts/$ vs 3.3 pts/$ for the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 — making the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE the 171.5% better value option.

FeatureAthlon Silver PRO 3125GECore 2 Extreme QX9770
MSRP
$108-92%
$1399
Performance per Dollar
42.9+1200%
3.3
Release Date
2020
2008

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.