
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE

Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE vs Core 2 Extreme QX9770 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE vs Core 2 Extreme QX9770 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE vs Core 2 Extreme QX9770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $1,291 less on MSRP ($108 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1201.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 42.9 vs 3.3 PassMark/$ ($108 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 136W, a 101W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Vega 3, while Core 2 Extreme QX9770 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 2 Extreme QX9770 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
2008Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,611 vs 4,633).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.3 vs 42.9 PassMark/$ ($1,399 MSRP vs $108 MSRP).
- ❌288.6% higher power demand at 136W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE better than Core 2 Extreme QX9770?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE vs Core 2 Extreme QX9770 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
The Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 4,633 points. Launch price was $149.

Core 2 Extreme QX9770
The Core 2 Extreme QX9770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 12 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 136 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,611 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
The Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE versus 3.2 GHz on the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 uses Yorkfield (2007−2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE scores 4,633 against the Core 2 Extreme QX9770's 4,611 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Extreme QX9770.
| Feature | Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE | Core 2 Extreme QX9770 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz+6% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+6% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 12 MB (total)+2300% |
| Process | 12 nm-73% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Picasso (2019−2022) | Yorkfield (2007−2009) |
| PassMark | 4,633 | 4,611 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 2,200 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 451 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,583 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2667 on the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE versus DDR3-1600 on the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 — the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE) vs 16 (Core 2 Extreme QX9770) — the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM4 (Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE) and X48,X38,P45 (Core 2 Extreme QX9770).
| Feature | Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE | Core 2 Extreme QX9770 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2667+67% | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+300% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 16+100% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE) / VT-x (Core 2 Extreme QX9770). The Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Vega 3), while the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Extreme QX9770 targets Enthusiast.
| Feature | Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE | Core 2 Extreme QX9770 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | — |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Enthusiast |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE was priced at $108, while the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 came in at $1399. On launch pricing ($108 vs $1399), Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE was $1291 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE delivers 42.9 pts/$ vs 3.3 pts/$ for the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 — making the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE the 171.5% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE | Core 2 Extreme QX9770 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $108-92% | $1399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 42.9+1200% | 3.3 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2008 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















