
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE

FX-6350
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE vs FX-6350 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE vs FX-6350 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE vs FX-6350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $24 less on MSRP ($108 MSRP vs $132 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 22.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 42.9 vs 35.2 PassMark/$ ($108 MSRP vs $132 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Vega 3, while FX-6350 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-6350 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,633 vs 4,640).
FX-6350
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 35.2 vs 42.9 PassMark/$ ($132 MSRP vs $108 MSRP).
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is FX-6350 better than Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE vs FX-6350 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
The Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 4,633 points. Launch price was $149.

FX-6350
The FX-6350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L2 cache: 6144 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,640 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-6350 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the FX-6350 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE versus 4.2 GHz on the FX-6350 — a 21.1% clock advantage for the FX-6350 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the FX-6350 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE scores 4,633 against the FX-6350's 4,640 — a 0.2% lead for the FX-6350.
| Feature | Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE | FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 6 / 6+200% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4.2 GHz+24% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.9 GHz+15% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 6144 kB+1100% |
| Process | 12 nm-63% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Picasso (2019−2022) | Vishera (2012−2015) |
| PassMark | 4,633 | 4,640 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-6350 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE | FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM3+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2667 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | — |
Advanced Features
The Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Vega 3), while the FX-6350 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE | FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE was priced at $108, while the FX-6350 came in at $132. On launch pricing ($108 vs $132), Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE was $24 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE delivers 42.9 pts/$ vs 35.2 pts/$ for the FX-6350 — making the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE the 19.9% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE | FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $108-18% | $132 |
| Performance per Dollar | 42.9+22% | 35.2 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















