Atom C3758
VS
Core 2 Extreme QX9770

Atom C3758 vs Core 2 Extreme QX9770

Intel

Atom C3758

8 Cores8 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core 2 Extreme QX9770

4 Cores4 Thrd136 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom C3758 is positioned at rank 585 and the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 is on rank 1088, so the Atom C3758 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom C3758

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
9008%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1701%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1511%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1167%
#352
Xeon 6741P
MSRP: $4421|Avg: $3780
99%
#353
EPYC 7452
MSRP: $2025|Avg: $2025
98%
#354
EPYC 7502P
MSRP: $2300|Avg: $1299
96%
#355
Xeon w7-3455
MSRP: $2489|Avg: $2625
96%
#356
EPYC 9334
MSRP: $2990|Avg: $1810
95%
#357
Xeon w9-3575X
MSRP: $3789|Avg: $675
94%
#585
Atom C3758
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#590
Xeon W-2125
MSRP: $444|Avg: $42
98%
#592
EPYC 7261
MSRP: $501|Avg: $8
96%
#594
Xeon E5-1620 v2
MSRP: $294|Avg: $50
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Extreme QX9770

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
94459%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
89255%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
64806%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
19523%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
15465%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
13528%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
7748%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
7647%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
6963%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
6962%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
6885%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
6699%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
6605%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
6578%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
6519%
#1088
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
100%
#1089
Athlon 64 X2 5600+
MSRP: $505|Avg: $15
100%
#1090
Athlon 64 2000+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
100%
#1091
Athlon 64 X2 5400+
MSRP: $485|Avg: $78
99%
#1092
Celeron 2.30
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
98%
#1093
Phenom X4 9450e
MSRP: $450|Avg: $430
98%
#1094
Athlon 64 X2 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $20
94%
#1095
Athlon 64 3000+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $10
92%
#1096
Athlon XP 3100+
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
86%
#1097
Athlon 64 3300+
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
79%
#1098
Athlon 64 2800+
MSRP: $178|Avg: $15
72%
#1099
Athlon 64 3700+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $20
69%
#1100
Athlon 64 FX-72
MSRP: $799|Avg: $40
68%
#1101
Athlon 64 X2 4200+
MSRP: $581|Avg: $110
65%
#1102
Athlon 64 3500+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $10
64%
#1103
Pentium D 830
MSRP: $316|Avg: $20
59%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom C3758 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4: 2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAtom C3758Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,399)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Yorkfield (2007−2009) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Extreme QX9770 (2008) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAtom C3758Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,399)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom C3758 and Core 2 Extreme QX9770

Intel

Atom C3758

The Atom C3758 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2400. Passmark benchmark score: 4,614 points. Launch price was $193.

Intel

Core 2 Extreme QX9770

The Core 2 Extreme QX9770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 12 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 136 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,611 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

The Atom C3758 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom C3758 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Atom C3758 versus 3.2 GHz on the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 — a 37% clock advantage for the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Atom C3758 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 uses Yorkfield (2007−2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3758 scores 4,614 against the Core 2 Extreme QX9770's 4,611 — a 0.1% lead for the Atom C3758. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 400 vs 451, a 12% lead for the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,400 vs 1,583 (41% advantage for the Atom C3758). L3 cache: 16 MB on the Atom C3758 vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Extreme QX9770.

FeatureAtom C3758Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+100%
4 / 4
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
3.2 GHz+45%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
3.2 GHz+45%
L3 Cache
16 MB
0 kB
L2 Cache
16 MB+33%
12 MB (total)
Process
14 nm-69%
45 nm
Architecture
Goldmont (2016−2017)
Yorkfield (2007−2009)
PassMark
4,614
4,611
Cinebench R23 Multi
2,200
Geekbench 6 Single
400
451+13%
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,400+52%
1,583
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom C3758 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Atom C3758 versus DDR3-1600 on the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 — the Atom C3758 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3758 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Atom C3758) and X48,X38,P45 (Core 2 Extreme QX9770).

FeatureAtom C3758Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Socket
FCBGA1310
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400+33%
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB+1500%
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Atom C3758) vs VT-x (Core 2 Extreme QX9770). Primary use case: Atom C3758 targets Server/Embedded, Core 2 Extreme QX9770 targets Enthusiast.

FeatureAtom C3758Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x
Target Use
Server/Embedded
Enthusiast