
Atom C3758 vs Core 2 Extreme QX9770

Atom C3758

Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom C3758 is positioned at rank 585 and the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 is on rank 1088, so the Atom C3758 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Atom C3758
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Atom C3758 | Core 2 Extreme QX9770 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,399) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Yorkfield (2007−2009) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Atom C3758 | Core 2 Extreme QX9770 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,399) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Atom C3758 and Core 2 Extreme QX9770

Atom C3758
The Atom C3758 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2400. Passmark benchmark score: 4,614 points. Launch price was $193.

Core 2 Extreme QX9770
The Core 2 Extreme QX9770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 12 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 136 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,611 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
The Atom C3758 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom C3758 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Atom C3758 versus 3.2 GHz on the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 — a 37% clock advantage for the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Atom C3758 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 uses Yorkfield (2007−2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3758 scores 4,614 against the Core 2 Extreme QX9770's 4,611 — a 0.1% lead for the Atom C3758. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 400 vs 451, a 12% lead for the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,400 vs 1,583 (41% advantage for the Atom C3758). L3 cache: 16 MB on the Atom C3758 vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Extreme QX9770.
| Feature | Atom C3758 | Core 2 Extreme QX9770 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+100% | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz+45% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz+45% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+33% | 12 MB (total) |
| Process | 14 nm-69% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Goldmont (2016−2017) | Yorkfield (2007−2009) |
| PassMark | 4,614 | 4,611 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 2,200 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 400 | 451+13% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,400+52% | 1,583 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom C3758 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Atom C3758 versus DDR3-1600 on the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 — the Atom C3758 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3758 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Atom C3758) and X48,X38,P45 (Core 2 Extreme QX9770).
| Feature | Atom C3758 | Core 2 Extreme QX9770 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1310 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400+33% | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+1500% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Atom C3758) vs VT-x (Core 2 Extreme QX9770). Primary use case: Atom C3758 targets Server/Embedded, Core 2 Extreme QX9770 targets Enthusiast.
| Feature | Atom C3758 | Core 2 Extreme QX9770 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x |
| Target Use | Server/Embedded | Enthusiast |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















