PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom C3758 vs Core i7-3612QM FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom C3758 vs Core i7-3612QM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom C3758

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Draws 25W instead of 35W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (2,400 vs 2,600).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-3612QM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-3612QM

2012

Why buy it

✅+8.3% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4000, while Atom C3758 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Atom C3758 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $378 MSRP, while Atom C3758 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌40% higher power demand at 35W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom C3758 better than Core i7-3612QM?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Atom C3758 is ahead with a 5.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-3612QM pulls ahead with 8.3% better Geekbench multi-core. Atom C3758 also has the bigger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-3612QM is the stronger fit. You are getting 8.3% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom C3758 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Atom C3758 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $378 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-3612QM only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 5.3% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom C3758 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2012) and 166.7% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 6 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom C3758 vs Core i7-3612QM Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom C3758

The Atom C3758 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2400. Passmark benchmark score: 4,614 points. Launch price was $193.

Core i7-3612QM

The Core i7-3612QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1224. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,661 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom C3758 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-3612QM offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Atom C3758 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Atom C3758 versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-3612QM — a 34% clock advantage for the Core i7-3612QM (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Atom C3758 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-3612QM uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3758 scores 4,614 against the Core i7-3612QM's 4,661 — a 1% lead for the Core i7-3612QM. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 400 vs 600, a 40% lead for the Core i7-3612QM that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,400 vs 2,600 (8% advantage for the Core i7-3612QM). L3 cache: 16 MB on the Atom C3758 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-3612QM.

Feature	Atom C3758	Core i7-3612QM
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	3.1 GHz+41%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+5%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB+167%	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	16 MB	256K (per core)+1500%
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Goldmont (2016−2017)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	4,614	4,661+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	400	600+50%
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,400	2,600+8%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom C3758 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-3612QM uses FCBGA1224 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Atom C3758 versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i7-3612QM — the Atom C3758 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3758 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Atom C3758) and HM75,HM76,HM77,QM77 (Core i7-3612QM).

Feature	Atom C3758	Core i7-3612QM
Socket	FCBGA1310	FCBGA1224
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400+50%	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB+700%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Atom C3758) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-3612QM). The Core i7-3612QM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Atom C3758 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Atom C3758 targets Server/Embedded, Core i7-3612QM targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-3612QM rivals AMD A10-5750M.

Feature	Atom C3758	Core i7-3612QM
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Intel HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Server/Embedded	Mainstream Laptop