Atom C3758 vs Core i5-4690T

Intel

Atom C3758

8 Cores8 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core i5-4690T

4 Cores4 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2014

Atom C3758 vs Core i5-4690T Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom C3758 vs Core i5-4690T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom C3758 vs Core i5-4690T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom C3758

2017

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +16.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…+166.7% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 6 MB).
  • βœ…Draws 25W instead of 45W, a 20W reduction.
  • βœ…100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (4,614 vs 4,620).

Core i5-4690T

2014

Why buy it

  • βœ…+0.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Atom C3758 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 16 MB).
  • ❌Launch MSRP is still $192 MSRP, while Atom C3758 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • ❌80% higher power demand at 45W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom C3758 better than Core i5-4690T?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Atom C3758 is ahead with a 16.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4690T pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark. Atom C3758 also has the bigger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 6 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4690T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Atom C3758 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Atom C3758 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $192 MSRP, and it still gives you a 16.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-4690T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2014 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (24.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom C3758 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2014) and 166.7% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 6 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom C3758 vs Core i5-4690T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Atom C3758

The Atom C3758 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016βˆ’2017) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2400. Passmark benchmark score: 4,614 points. Launch price was $193.

Intel

Core i5-4690T

The Core i5-4690T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013βˆ’2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,620 points. Launch price was $69.

⚑

Processing Power

The Atom C3758 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i5-4690T offers 4 cores / 4 threads β€” the Atom C3758 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Atom C3758 versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-4690T β€” a 45.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-4690T (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Atom C3758 uses the Goldmont (2016βˆ’2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-4690T uses Haswell (2013βˆ’2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3758 scores 4,614 against the Core i5-4690T's 4,620 β€” a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-4690T. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Atom C3758 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-4690T.

FeatureAtom C3758Core i5-4690T
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+100%
4 / 4
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
3.5 GHz+59%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
2.5 GHz+14%
L3 Cache
16 MB+167%
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
16 MB+6300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Goldmont (2016βˆ’2017)
Haswell (2013βˆ’2015)
PassMark
4,614
4,620
Geekbench 6 Single
400
β€”
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,400
β€”
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom C3758 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4690T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAtom C3758Core i5-4690T
Socket
FCBGA1310
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
β€”
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
β€”
RAM Channels
2
β€”
ECC Support
Yes
β€”
PCIe Lanes
16
β€”
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Atom C3758) / not specified (Core i5-4690T). Primary use case: Atom C3758 targets Server/Embedded.

FeatureAtom C3758Core i5-4690T
Integrated GPU
No
β€”
Unlocked
No
β€”
AVX-512
No
β€”
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
β€”
Target Use
Server/Embedded
β€”