Core i3-9300 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

Intel

Core i3-9300

4 Cores4 Thrd62 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······

Core i3-9300 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-9300 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-9300 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-9300

2019

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +12.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 62W instead of 65W, a 3W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 needs a discrete GPU.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 3 PRO 1300.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (7,105 vs 7,106).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 49.7 vs 64.6 PassMark/$ ($143 MSRP vs $110 MSRP).

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

2017

Why buy it

  • +0% higher PassMark.
  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
  • Costs $33 less on MSRP ($110 MSRP vs $143 MSRP).
  • Delivers 30.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 64.6 vs 49.7 PassMark/$ ($110 MSRP vs $143 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-9300 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i3-9300 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-9300.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 better than Core i3-9300?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-9300 is ahead with a 12.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 pulls ahead with 0% better PassMark. Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 is the better buy right now. Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 comes in $33 cheaper on MSRP at $110 MSRP versus $143 MSRP, and it still gives you 0% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i3-9300 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 12.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 30.0% better value on MSRP (64.6 vs 49.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-9300 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i3-9300

The Core i3-9300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 7,105 points. Launch price was $143.

AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

The Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 7,106 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-9300 and Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i3-9300 versus 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 — a 20.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-9300 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i3-9300 uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-9300 scores 7,105 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300's 7,106 — a 0% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-9300 vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300.

FeatureCore i3-9300Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz+23%
3.5 GHz
Base Clock
3.7 GHz+16%
3.2 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark
7,105
7,106
Geekbench 6 Single
1,498
Geekbench 6 Multi
4,025
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-9300 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-9300Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
Socket
LGA1151
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-9300) / not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 1300). The Core i3-9300 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCore i3-9300Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-9300 was priced at $143, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 came in at $110. On launch pricing ($143 vs $110), Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 was $33 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-9300 delivers 49.7 pts/$ vs 64.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 — making the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 the 26.1% better value option.

FeatureCore i3-9300Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
MSRP
$143
$110-23%
Performance per Dollar
49.7
64.6+30%
Release Date
2019
2017

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.