Core i3-9300 vs Xeon W3680

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-9300 vs Xeon W3680 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-9300 vs Xeon W3680: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-9300

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $451 less on MSRP ($143 MSRP vs $594 MSRP).
✅Delivers 320.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.7 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($143 MSRP vs $594 MSRP).
✅Draws 62W instead of 130W, a 68W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon W3680 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W3680, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.

Xeon W3680

2010

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,025 vs 7,105).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 49.7 PassMark/$ ($594 MSRP vs $143 MSRP).
❌109.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 62W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-9300 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-9300.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-9300 better than Xeon W3680?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W3680 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-9300 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-9300 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-9300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-9300 is the better buy right now. Core i3-9300 comes in $451 cheaper on MSRP at $143 MSRP versus $594 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 320.1% better value on MSRP (49.7 vs 11.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-9300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-9300 vs Xeon W3680 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-9300

The Core i3-9300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 7,105 points. Launch price was $143.

Xeon W3680

The Xeon W3680 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Gulftown (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,025 points. Launch price was $350.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-9300 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon W3680 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon W3680 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i3-9300 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon W3680 — a 17.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-9300 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.33 GHz). The Core i3-9300 uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W3680 uses Gulftown (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-9300 scores 7,105 against the Xeon W3680's 7,025 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i3-9300. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-9300 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon W3680.

Feature	Core i3-9300	Xeon W3680
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+19%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+11%	3.33 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	12 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Gulftown (2010−2011)
PassMark	7,105+1%	7,025
Geekbench 6 Single	1,498	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	4,025	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-9300 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W3680 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-9300	Xeon W3680
Socket	LGA1151	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-9300) / not specified (Xeon W3680). The Core i3-9300 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon W3680 requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Core i3-9300	Xeon W3680
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 630	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-9300 was priced at $143, while the Xeon W3680 came in at $594. On launch pricing ($143 vs $594), Core i3-9300 was $451 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-9300 delivers 49.7 pts/$ vs 11.8 pts/$ for the Xeon W3680 — making the Core i3-9300 the 123.1% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-9300	Xeon W3680
MSRP	$143-76%	$594
Performance per Dollar	49.7+321%	11.8
Release Date	2019	2010

Search Core i3-9300 on Amazon

Search Xeon W3680 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.