Core i3-9300T vs Xeon E3-1245 v2

Intel

Core i3-9300T

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Xeon E3-1245 v2

4 Cores8 Thrd77 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2012

Core i3-9300T vs Xeon E3-1245 v2 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-9300T vs Xeon E3-1245 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-9300T vs Xeon E3-1245 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-9300T

2019

Why buy it

  • βœ…+43.6% higher Geekbench multi-core.
  • βœ…Draws 35W instead of 77W, a 42W reduction.
  • βœ…Includes a boxed cooler (Intel Stock), unlike Xeon E3-1245 v2.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E3-1245 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E3-1245 v2, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.5 vs 23.3 PassMark/$ ($309 MSRP vs $273 MSRP).

Xeon E3-1245 v2

2012

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +15.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.
  • βœ…Costs $36 less on MSRP ($273 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 13.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.3 vs 20.5 PassMark/$ ($273 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (2,273 vs 3,265).
  • ❌120% higher power demand at 77W vs 35W.
  • ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-9300T.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-9300T better than Xeon E3-1245 v2?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1245 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-9300T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-9300T is the stronger fit. You are getting 43.6% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i3-9300T is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E3-1245 v2 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i3-9300T comes in 13.2% more expensive on MSRP at $309 MSRP versus $273 MSRP, and it still gives you 43.6% better Geekbench multi-core. The compromise is that Xeon E3-1245 v2 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 15.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E3-1245 v2 is also 13.8% better value on MSRP (23.3 vs 20.5 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-9300T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-9300T vs Xeon E3-1245 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i3-9300T

The Core i3-9300T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017βˆ’2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 6,323 points. Launch price was $143.

Intel

Xeon E3-1245 v2

The Xeon E3-1245 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012βˆ’2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,357 points. Launch price was $462.

⚑

Processing Power

The Core i3-9300T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E3-1245 v2's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i3-9300T versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E3-1245 v2 β€” identical boost frequencies (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i3-9300T uses the Coffee Lake (2017βˆ’2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1245 v2 uses Ivy Bridge (2012βˆ’2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-9300T scores 6,323 against the Xeon E3-1245 v2's 6,357 β€” a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E3-1245 v2. Geekbench 6 single-core β€” the metric most relevant to gaming β€” records 1,000 vs 659, a 41.1% lead for the Core i3-9300T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 3,265 vs 2,273 (35.8% advantage for the Core i3-9300T). L3 cache: 8 MB on the Core i3-9300T vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1245 v2.

FeatureCore i3-9300TXeon E3-1245 v2
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz
3.8 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz
3.4 GHz+6%
L3 Cache
8 MB
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Coffee Lake (2017βˆ’2019)
Ivy Bridge (2012βˆ’2013)
PassMark
6,323
6,357
Geekbench 6 Single
1,000+52%
659
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,265+44%
2,273
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-9300T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1245 v2 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-9300T versus DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E3-1245 v2 β€” the Core i3-9300T supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-9300T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB β€” 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H310,B360,H370,Z370,Z390 (Core i3-9300T) and Intel C202,Intel C204,Intel C206,Intel C216 (Xeon E3-1245 v2).

FeatureCore i3-9300TXeon E3-1245 v2
Socket
LGA1151
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400+50%
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+100%
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
16
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-9300T) vs Yes (Xeon E3-1245 v2). Both include integrated graphics β€” Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Core i3-9300T) and HD Graphics P4000 (Xeon E3-1245 v2) β€” useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-9300T targets Low Power Desktop, Xeon E3-1245 v2 targets Server.

FeatureCore i3-9300TXeon E3-1245 v2
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HD Graphics P4000
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Yes
Target Use
Low Power Desktop
Server
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-9300T was priced at $309, while the Xeon E3-1245 v2 came in at $273. On launch pricing ($309 vs $273), Xeon E3-1245 v2 was $36 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-9300T delivers 20.5 pts/$ vs 23.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1245 v2 β€” making the Xeon E3-1245 v2 the 12.9% better value option.

FeatureCore i3-9300TXeon E3-1245 v2
MSRP
$309
$273-12%
Performance per Dollar
20.5
23.3+14%
Release Date
2019
2012

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.