
Core i3-9350K

Xeon E5-2640 v2
Core i3-9350K vs Xeon E5-2640 v2 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-9350K vs Xeon E5-2640 v2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-9350K vs Xeon E5-2640 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-9350K
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,931 less on MSRP ($184 MSRP vs $4,115 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2127.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 41.3 vs 1.9 PassMark/$ ($184 MSRP vs $4,115 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 91W instead of 95W, a 4W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2640 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,596 vs 7,625).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2640 v2, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E5-2640 v2
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 41.3 PassMark/$ ($4,115 MSRP vs $184 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2640 v2 better than Core i3-9350K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-9350K vs Xeon E5-2640 v2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-9350K
The Core i3-9350K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 91 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 7,596 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2640 v2
The Xeon E5-2640 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,625 points. Launch price was $728.
Processing Power
The Core i3-9350K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-2640 v2 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2640 v2 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i3-9350K versus 2.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2640 v2 — a 59.2% clock advantage for the Core i3-9350K (base: 4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i3-9350K uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2640 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-9350K scores 7,596 against the Xeon E5-2640 v2's 7,625 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E5-2640 v2. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-9350K vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2640 v2.
| Feature | Core i3-9350K | Xeon E5-2640 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+84% | 2.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+100% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+233% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) |
| PassMark | 7,596 | 7,625 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-9350K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2640 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-9350K | Xeon E5-2640 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 768 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 40 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-9350K was priced at $184, while the Xeon E5-2640 v2 came in at $4115. On launch pricing ($184 vs $4115), Core i3-9350K was $3931 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-9350K delivers 41.3 pts/$ vs 1.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2640 v2 — making the Core i3-9350K the 182.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-9350K | Xeon E5-2640 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $184-96% | $4115 |
| Performance per Dollar | 41.3+2074% | 1.9 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














