Core i5-1034G1 vs Core i7-7820EQ

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-1034G1 vs Core i7-7820EQ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-1034G1 vs Core i7-7820EQ: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-1034G1

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 45W, a 43W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics G1, while Core i7-7820EQ needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).

Core i7-7820EQ

2017

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,470 vs 7,550).
❌Launch MSRP is still $378 MSRP, while Core i5-1034G1 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌2150% higher power demand at 45W vs 2W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1034G1 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-1034G1 better than Core i7-7820EQ?

Yes. Core i5-1034G1 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-1034G1 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-1034G1 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-1034G1 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i5-1034G1 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $378 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-7820EQ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2017 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (19.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on that older platform.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-1034G1 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-1034G1 vs Core i7-7820EQ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-1034G1

The Core i5-1034G1 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 May 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 0.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB + 6 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 7,550 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-7820EQ

The Core i7-7820EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Max frequency: 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 7,470 points. Launch price was $378.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-1034G1 and Core i7-7820EQ share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-1034G1 versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-7820EQ — a 14.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-1034G1. The Core i5-1034G1 uses the Ice Lake U (2019−2020) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-7820EQ uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1034G1 scores 7,550 against the Core i7-7820EQ's 7,470 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i5-1034G1. L3 cache: 6 MB on the Core i5-1034G1 vs 8 MB on the Core i7-7820EQ.

Feature	Core i5-1034G1	Core i7-7820EQ
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+16%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	0.8 GHz	—
L3 Cache	6 MB	8 MB+33%
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Ice Lake U (2019−2020)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	7,550+1%	7,470
Geekbench 6 Single	1,475	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-1034G1) / not specified (Core i7-7820EQ). The Core i5-1034G1 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics G1), while the Core i7-7820EQ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1034G1 targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-1034G1 rivals Ryzen 5 3500U.