
Core i5-1034G1

Xeon E5-2640 v2
Core i5-1034G1 vs Xeon E5-2640 v2 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-1034G1 vs Xeon E5-2640 v2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-1034G1 vs Xeon E5-2640 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-1034G1
2019Why buy it
- β Draws 2W instead of 95W, a 93W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics G1, while Xeon E5-2640 v2 needs a discrete GPU.
- β AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2640 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (7,550 vs 7,625).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 20 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2640 v2, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E5-2640 v2
2013Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +20.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 6 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- β 150% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $4,115 MSRP, while Core i5-1034G1 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β4650% higher power demand at 95W vs 2W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i5-1034G1 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2640 v2 better than Core i5-1034G1?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-1034G1 vs Xeon E5-2640 v2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-1034G1
The Core i5-1034G1 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 May 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake U (2019β2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 0.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MBΒ +Β 6 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 7,550 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2640 v2
The Xeon E5-2640 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,625 points. Launch price was $728.
Processing Power
The Core i5-1034G1 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2640 v2 offers 8 cores / 16 threads β the Xeon E5-2640 v2 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-1034G1 versus 2.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2640 v2 β a 36.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-1034G1 (base: 0.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-1034G1 uses the Ice Lake U (2019β2020) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E5-2640 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1034G1 scores 7,550 against the Xeon E5-2640 v2's 7,625 β a 1% lead for the Xeon E5-2640 v2. L3 cache: 6 MB on the Core i5-1034G1 vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2640 v2.
| Feature | Core i5-1034G1 | Xeon E5-2640 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz+44% | 2.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 0.8 GHz | 2 GHz+150% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB | 20 MB (total)+233% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm-55% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Ice Lake U (2019β2020) | Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) |
| PassMark | 7,550 | 7,625 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,475 | β |
Memory & Platform
Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR4-3733 on the Core i5-1034G1 versus DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E5-2640 v2 β the Core i5-1034G1 supports 133.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2640 v2 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB β 1100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-1034G1) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2640 v2). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-1034G1) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2640 v2) β the Xeon E5-2640 v2 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i5-1034G1 | Xeon E5-2640 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | β | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR4-3733+133% | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 768 GB+1100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 40+150% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-1034G1) / not specified (Xeon E5-2640 v2). The Core i5-1034G1 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics G1), while the Xeon E5-2640 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1034G1 targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-1034G1 rivals Ryzen 5 3500U.
| Feature | Core i5-1034G1 | Xeon E5-2640 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics G1 | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | Yes | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | β |
| Target Use | Mainstream Laptop | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













